Academic IELTS Writing task 1 Sample 103 - Quantities of goods transported in the UK between 1974 and 2002
The line graph shows the variation in the million tonnes of goods transportation by road, water, rail and pipeline in the UK during a 28-year period from 1974 to 2002.
We can see that the most common trend was for the amount of goods transported to increase consistently with time. For example, the figure on road delivery from over 65 to around 100 million tonnes. Likewise, pipeline transportation figure was its smallest point of about 5 million tonnes in 1974, but 20 years later, it was enlarged to over 20 million tonnes after 1994 and remained stable until the year end.These are all substantial increase.
The quantity of goods transported by water rose from 40 to over 60 million tonnes. The only period when there was a reduction in 1998 (from 60 to 50 million tonnes). However, an amount of goods transported by rail fluctuated across 1974 to 2002, between 30 and 40 million tonnes.
Overall, this chart indicates that it was mainly road, pipeline and water which gave rise to the expansion of the quantities of goods transported over the United Kingdom, except rail transportation.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-08-08 | Ashish choudhary | 78 | view |
| 2019-08-08 | Ashish choudhary | 78 | view |
| 2018-07-05 | khj | 49 | view |
| 2019-07-16 | ankit5908 | 73 | view |
- The graph below shows the quantities of goods transported in the UK between 1974 and 2002 by four different modes of transport.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.» You should write 73
- Anybody can use a mobile phone to answer the work and personal calls at any time or 7 days a week. Does this development have more positive or negative effects on both individuals and society? 84
- The graphs show changes in spending habits of people in UK between 1971 and 2001. Write a report to a university lecturer describing the data. 84
- Many students have to study subjects which they do not like. Some people think this is a complete waste of time. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? 84
- Scientists predict that humans will speak the same language in the future Do you think it is a positive or negative development 100
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 410, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: These
... and remained stable until the year end.These are all substantial increase. The q...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, likewise, as for, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 40.0 33.7804878049 118% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 916.0 965.302439024 95% => OK
No of words: 186.0 196.424390244 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.9247311828 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.69299088775 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.714324399 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 107.0 106.607317073 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.575268817204 0.547539520022 105% => OK
syllable_count: 260.1 283.868780488 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.9002374779 43.030603864 135% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.5 112.824112599 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.25 22.9334400587 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.375 5.23603664747 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.187204547615 0.215688989381 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0967639923567 0.103423049105 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0769038363509 0.0843802449381 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.131603834664 0.15604864568 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0507729910351 0.0819641961636 62% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.2329268293 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.55 11.4140731707 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.49 8.06136585366 93% => OK
difficult_words: 32.0 40.7170731707 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.