The pie chart below shows the main reasons why students chose to study at a particular UK university in 1987 and in 2007. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparison where relevant.
The given pie charts well compare the percentage of students for each main reason in UK between 1987 and 2007. Overall, it is noticeable that the percentage of suitable degree courses, close to parental home, and quality of teaching experienced a decrease, whilst that of the other 2 reasons underwent a rise.
In detail, it can be explained that the percentage of suitable degree courses was considered the highest in 1987 and in 2007, or at 35% and 37% in respective; similarly, the percentage of close to parental home in 1987 increased by 12% in 2007, or at 22%. Meanwhile, the proportion of quality of teaching experienced a slight growth since this proportion rose from 15% at the beginning to 18% at the end. On the other hand, the figure of quality resources declined gently from 21% to 17% two decades later. Finally, of good sports and social activities, 19% dipped to only 6%.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-08-15 | dm0218 | 56 | view |
| 2019-06-15 | trang130120022002 | 78 | view |
| 2018-07-31 | mary.ssherr | 78 | view |
| 2018-07-27 | Drragkloha | 78 | view |
| 2018-07-24 | mary.ssherr | 83 | view |
- The bar chart below shows the passenger kilometers travelled by different means of transport in the UK in 1990 and 2000 48
- The three pie charts below show the changes in annual spending by a particular UK school in 1981 1991 and 2001 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 89
- Some people believe that living in big cities is becoming more difficult Others believe that it is getting easier Discuss both views and give your own opinion 85
- The best way to solve the world’s environmental problems to increase the costs of fuels. Do you agree or disagree??? 11
- Some parents buy their children a large number of toys to play with. What are the advantages and disadvantages for the child of having a large number of toys?Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experie 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, similarly, so, well, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 737.0 965.302439024 76% => OK
No of words: 154.0 196.424390244 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.78571428571 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.52273666998 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73755790974 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 94.0 106.607317073 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.61038961039 0.547539520022 111% => OK
syllable_count: 216.9 283.868780488 76% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 63.0275512948 43.030603864 146% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.833333333 112.824112599 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.6666666667 22.9334400587 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.0 5.23603664747 172% => OK
Paragraphs: 2.0 3.83414634146 52% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.162317946552 0.215688989381 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0770469514942 0.103423049105 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.101312466734 0.0843802449381 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.139030211705 0.15604864568 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.050630996115 0.0819641961636 62% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.2329268293 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 63.02 61.2550243902 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.8 11.4140731707 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.16 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 32.0 40.7170731707 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 11.4329268293 157% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.