Airport visitors, 2007-2012 (Millions of travelers per year)
The table represents the number of trippers from different airports between 2007 to 2012. Interestingly though, it is measured in millions of persons. At first glance it was evident that Frankfurt had the highest amount of travelers during this times, the exception is in 2009 when Dusseldorf reached the upper number rather than another place.
Moving to a more detailed analysis concerning the data from 2007 to 2009, more than 36,5 million travelers came to Frankfurt, followed by Dusseldorf which achieved 27,2 million and 36,4 million people, and then Berlin Tegel was lower around 10 million of visitors than Dusseldorf in the initial two years. However, In 2009, the most trippers reached by Dusseldorf, appropiately 48,2 million of persons per year while other points were under it.
Turning to the year during the period 2010 to 2012, Frankturt occupied the first place which the amount of travelers was upper than 47,3 million people while the same number was obtained by Berlin Tegel, surely 43,3 million persons over the timeframe. Finally, Dusseldorf gained the lowest data in the beginning two years which was about 35 million people and in 2012, the quantity was 45,6 million visitors.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-11-25 | Wulan | 78 | view |
| 2019-08-16 | dhavaljo15 | 56 | view |
- In marriages today some argue that it is the responsibility of both spouses to earn a living for the family To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- The chart shows the sales of five different kinds of jam from 2009 to 2014 67
- The table shows the cost of water in 5 cities in Australia 73
- the result of the survey conducted over a three year period to discover what people who live in London think of the city 73
- The chart explained the percentage of households with electrical appliances and the number of hours of housework per week in 1920 to 2019 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 241, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
... the highest amount of travelers during this times, the exception is in 2009 when Du...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, however, if, so, then, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1010.0 965.302439024 105% => OK
No of words: 195.0 196.424390244 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.17948717949 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.73687570622 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.44392200502 2.65546596893 92% => OK
Unique words: 115.0 106.607317073 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.589743589744 0.547539520022 108% => OK
syllable_count: 280.8 283.868780488 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 80.3522855675 43.030603864 187% => OK
Chars per sentence: 144.285714286 112.824112599 128% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.8571428571 22.9334400587 121% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.28571428571 5.23603664747 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.344101042319 0.215688989381 160% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.147708003813 0.103423049105 143% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.058365395329 0.0843802449381 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.217025691853 0.15604864568 139% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.034748417343 0.0819641961636 42% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.9 13.2329268293 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.99 61.2550243902 100% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.06 11.4140731707 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.62 8.06136585366 107% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.