The amount of money that a children's charity located in the USA spent and received in one year,2016.
The graph shows the amount of the revenue and the expenditures for a children’s charity in the USA in 2016. In generally, the donated food made up the majority of the revenue, while the program services made up the majority of the expenditures. Total revenue sources just exceeded outgoings.
Firstly, the pie charts illustrate that there were 5 distinct origins of charitable donations. Even though donated food provides the most of the revenue for the charity at 86%. The second biggest income is community contributions for 10.4%. Both investment income and Government grants accounted for 0.2% of the total proportion. The program revenue was documented at 2.2%, while other income was recorded at 0.4%.
On the other hand, the charity's expenses were categorized into three distinct. Program services consumed the largest portion at 95.8%. Nonetheless, the amount of fundraising was 2.6%. While management and general was 1.6%.
Overall, it is evident from the graph that the donated food played a major role. Whereas, the majority of money was dedicated to the program services.
- Take a look at the question and the graph You should spend about 20 minutes on this task The line graph shows visits to and from the UK from 1979 to 1999 and the bar graph shows the most popular countries visited by UK residents in 1999 Summarize the info 56
- In recent years more and more people are choosing to read e books rather than paper book Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 56
- The charts below give information on UK spending habits for books bought over the internet Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make a comparison where relevant 11
- The charts show average level of participation in education and the highest education level of adults from 2000 to 2010 in Singapore 67
- The pie charts below show the percentage of kinds of books sold by a bookseller between 1972and 2012 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, nonetheless, second, so, whereas, while, in general, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 21.0 33.7804878049 62% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 916.0 965.302439024 95% => OK
No of words: 173.0 196.424390244 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.29479768786 4.92477711251 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.62669911048 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77821292176 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 99.0 106.607317073 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.57225433526 0.547539520022 105% => OK
syllable_count: 279.0 283.868780488 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.07073170732 374% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 8.94146341463 157% => OK
Sentence length: 12.0 22.4926829268 53% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 25.4266652576 43.030603864 59% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 65.4285714286 112.824112599 58% => More chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 12.3571428571 22.9334400587 54% => More words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 6.5 5.23603664747 124% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.104479201584 0.215688989381 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.04015439057 0.103423049105 39% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.081522495807 0.0843802449381 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.066390675315 0.15604864568 43% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0483444182086 0.0819641961636 59% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.7 13.2329268293 73% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.3 61.2550243902 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.0 10.3012195122 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.51 11.4140731707 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.98 8.06136585366 111% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 40.7170731707 128% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.4329268293 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 6.8 10.9970731707 62% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 11.0658536585 63% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.