Average Carbon Dioxide (CO2) emission per person in the United Kingdom, Sweden, Italy, and Portugal, between 1967 to 2007

Essay topics:

Average Carbon Dioxide (CO2) emission per person in the United Kingdom, Sweden, Italy, and Portugal, between 1967 to 2007

The graph gives information about the average carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions per person in four different countries along four decades from 1967 to 2007. There were four countries will be figured out and measured in metric tonnes. Overall, the most sharply increased of CO2 emissions happened to be in Portugal incrementally whilst the most declined trend was in Sweden thoroughly.

Regarding to the data, the most positive movement CO2 discharges had to be in Portugal, even though initially started just at 1 metric tonne in 1967 then it went higher to 5,2 metric tonnes sharply in 2007. The next highest increased trend happened to be in Italy which gradually increased decade to decade, CO2 releases was noted from 4,1 metric tonnes in 1967 and climbed up to 3,4 higher in fourth decade approximately.

Differs with the former countries, in the remaining countries the trend were contrastingly decreased. The CO2 discharges amount in United Kingdom was tend to large but on the other hand the trend was slightly declined which was counted from 10,5 and lower to 9 metric tonnes between 1967 and 2007. Therefore, the most decreased CO2 emissions had to be in Sweden which firstly marked at 8,5 metric tonnes in 1967 and got down to 5,7 metric tonnes in the last decade respectively.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2019-06-27 ribimultisona 73 view

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 151, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'tended'.
Suggestion: tended
...discharges amount in United Kingdom was tend to large but on the other hand the tren...
^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, if, regarding, so, then, therefore, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 7.0 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 33.7804878049 124% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1075.0 965.302439024 111% => OK
No of words: 215.0 196.424390244 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.0 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82921379641 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63050293677 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 114.0 106.607317073 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.53023255814 0.547539520022 97% => OK
syllable_count: 313.2 283.868780488 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.7433150301 43.030603864 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 134.375 112.824112599 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.875 22.9334400587 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.25 5.23603664747 177% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.258925772659 0.215688989381 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.108673157981 0.103423049105 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.10091387559 0.0843802449381 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.17747591534 0.15604864568 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0645995667654 0.0819641961636 79% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 13.2329268293 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 61.2550243902 87% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.3012195122 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.02 11.4140731707 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.97 8.06136585366 111% => OK
difficult_words: 55.0 40.7170731707 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.