Some people think that all university students should study whatever they like. Others believe that they should only be allowed to study subjects that will be useful in the future, such as those related to science and technology
Those days, it becomes a controversial topic that all students should study depend on their interest. Some might have believe that they should only be allowed to study subject that prospectively useful such as those related to science and technology. There are both advantages and disadvantages for students who decided to study whatever they like certainly. In this essay, I absolutely agree that lead the students to study depend on their interest will gives more merits rather than drawbacks.
In the one hand, students who freed to choose their own subjects to study will feel suitable with their passion. It is because the decision is depending on their interest so they will study without under pressured. Thus, secondly the students can more improve and expand their passion. It is due to the fondness, the students unburdened when they are going through it. For example, a student decided to take arts and musical major and focus on music instrumental subject. The student found that he is good at making a guitar and piano instruments since he was very young and he chose to take the major which potentially increase his music skills. As the result, the student was ill enjoy and love every single process on expanding the passion properly. So it is important to lead the students deciding the own subject to study freely.
Differs from the benefit above, the point of view that students should be allowed to study subject which useful the future such as science and technology is related to its prospect after years passed. So theirs a drawback of allowing students choose their major freely which will affect their upcoming career. It is because in today’s world, scientist and technologist prospects is obviously promising. For instance, currently technology sector is rapidly developing which possible to expand sharply in the future. So the career progression in technology sector will develope greatly. Therefore, actually there is a merit of leading students to study subject that prospectively useful especially which related to science and technology, but we need to consider.
In conclusion, from right here I stand that I believe leading students to study whatever they want is a better decision rather than force them to take a certain subject. In my opinion, it gives more advantages rather than the demerits.
- Housing and accommodation has become a major problem in many countries around the world What are some of the main factors that have contributed to this problem What can be done to help reducing the number of homeless people 84
- UK graduate and postgraduate students who did not go into full-time work did after leaving college in 2008 78
- The first chart below shows how energy is used in an average Australian household. The second chart shows the greenhouse gas emissions which result from this energy use. 67
- The differences in wheat exports over three different areas 73
- The main reasons for study among students of different age groups and the amount of support they received from employers 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 119, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'believed'.
Suggestion: believed
...pend on their interest. Some might have believe that they should only be allowed to stu...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 456, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'will' requires the base form of the verb: 'give'
Suggestion: give
... to study depend on their interest will gives more merits rather than drawbacks. ...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 141, Rule ID: PROGRESSIVE_VERBS[1]
Message: This verb is normally not used in the progressive form. Try a simple form instead.
...eir passion. It is because the decision is depending on their interest so they will study wi...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 385, Rule ID: PROGRESSIVE_VERBS[1]
Message: This verb is normally not used in the progressive form. Try a simple form instead.
...d, scientist and technologist prospects is obviously promising. For instance, currently technology sec...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, but, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 7.30460921844 219% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 43.0 24.0651302605 179% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1964.0 1615.20841683 122% => OK
No of words: 382.0 315.596192385 121% => OK
Chars per words: 5.14136125654 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.42095241839 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65630840506 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 194.0 176.041082164 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.507853403141 0.561755894193 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 603.9 506.74238477 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 16.0721442886 124% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.9948680745 49.4020404114 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.2 106.682146367 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.1 20.7667163134 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.1 7.06120827912 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 18.0 8.67935871743 207% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.401049065663 0.244688304435 164% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.122888205751 0.084324248473 146% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.127367401108 0.0667982634062 191% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.257327912388 0.151304729494 170% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.142041725679 0.056905535591 250% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.0946893788 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.53 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.13 8.58950901804 95% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 78.4519038076 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.