The bar below shows the estimated percentage of car trips taken by drivers in 2005.
The bar graph compares the estimated proportion of car trips made by male and female drivers in 8 different reasons 2005.
Overall, there were more women who drove their cars for different reasons in 2005. It is also noticeable that work was the primary reason for car trips in both genders. While women show little interest in visiting town, going to bank and running errands were for males.
Men drove their cars primarily for work purposes, which was higher than women by around 13% to just over a half. The other two reasons where the number of car trips taken by males exceeded that of females were recreation and visiting town, with approximately 10% each for men and just under 5% each for women.
Shopping was the major reason for females to use their cars at just below 20% as opposed to males at exactly 10%. Similarly, the figure for courses car trips taken by women was bigger than men at just over a tenth and just below10% respectively. The remaining three purposes which were running errands, going to bank and visiting a friend were more popular in women with car trips of about 10% each as compared to men at just under 5% with each category.
- Some people think that not all criminals should be kept in prison. Some criminals should do unpaid work to help other people in the community. Do you agree or disagree with the statement? 73
- The given graph shows the main sources of energy in the USA in two separate years. 73
- The charts below show the numbers of men and women attending four evening classes in a secondary school in Britain and the percentage of these in 5 different age groups. 78
- The line graph below shows how much money was spent on cars in four different countries in Asia 73
- The chart shows the changes that took place in three different areas of crime in Newport city centre from 2000-2012. 11
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, similarly, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 968.0 965.302439024 100% => OK
No of words: 207.0 196.424390244 105% => OK
Chars per words: 4.67632850242 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.79308509922 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.22642953953 2.65546596893 84% => OK
Unique words: 107.0 106.607317073 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.51690821256 0.547539520022 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 288.9 283.868780488 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.5704934618 43.030603864 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.555555556 112.824112599 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0 22.9334400587 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.33333333333 5.23603664747 64% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.221109947534 0.215688989381 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.109685803543 0.103423049105 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0871892230054 0.0843802449381 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.171814427501 0.15604864568 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.100759574733 0.0819641961636 123% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.2329268293 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.16 11.4140731707 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.6 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.