The bar chart below shows the estimated percentage of car trips taken by drivers in 2005.
The given bar chart illustrates the information about the analysed percentage of car tours taken by drivers in 2005.
There were two types of drivers such as men and women. Women used car for courses, bank, running errands, visiting friends and shopping more than men. On the other hand, men used car for visiting towns, recreation and work more than men.
As for women, they took a car for work more than other trips, it was 39℅. While the shopping was only 15℅ and it was less than work tours. The other traveling like courses, bank, running errands, visiting friends were near 10%. On contrary, visiting towns and recreation was lower than other tours.
As for the men, they took the car for work was higher than women, as 52%. However, the other traveling such as courses, visiting towns, recreation and shopping near the 10%, while, for trips like bank, running errands and visiting friends were less than 10%.
Overall, the women used car more than men in courses, bank, running errands, visiting friends and shopping. On opposite side, the men used car more for visiting towns, recreation, and work.
- The bar chart below shows the participation of children in selected leisure activities in Australia. 73
- Some people think that robots are important for human s future development Others think that robots have negative effects on society Discuss both views and give your opinion 78
- The bar chart below shows the estimated percentage of car trips taken by drivers in 2005. 56
- The chart below shows the annual water usage by different industries. 67
- Many people think that home cooked food is healthy but many people still prefer eating out Why is this so 77
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, while, as for, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 14.0 33.7804878049 41% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 925.0 965.302439024 96% => OK
No of words: 190.0 196.424390244 97% => OK
Chars per words: 4.86842105263 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.71268753763 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.1803771053 2.65546596893 82% => OK
Unique words: 79.0 106.607317073 74% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.415789473684 0.547539520022 76% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 256.5 283.868780488 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.07073170732 374% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 22.4926829268 67% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.5246701239 43.030603864 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 77.0833333333 112.824112599 68% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.8333333333 22.9334400587 69% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.16666666667 5.23603664747 80% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.11765561809 0.215688989381 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0638623805077 0.103423049105 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.108484047921 0.0843802449381 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.119984074249 0.15604864568 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.149603339401 0.0819641961636 183% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.4 13.2329268293 71% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 73.17 61.2550243902 119% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.8 10.3012195122 66% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.67 11.4140731707 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.46 8.06136585366 80% => OK
difficult_words: 25.0 40.7170731707 61% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 11.4329268293 57% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.9970731707 73% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 11.0658536585 63% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.