The bar chart below gives information about the number of students studying Computer Science at a UK university between 2010 and 2012.
The bar graph depicts the data of figure of pupils attend computer science at UK university From 2010 to 2012.
Overall, it is clear that in 2010, there was the lowest number of international women students since highest domestic men students attended this class in 2012.
As the graph shows, according to men in 2010, only 20 international students attended the computer science in Britain university. Then the number of students increased drastically under 40. Meantime, the figure of domestic pupils in 2010, accounted for about 39. After decreasing in number of local students, it experienced an increase significantly and reached at 43.
In terms of women, Figure for domestic women pupils stood at above 30. Afterwards, there was considerable increase by approximately 14 students in 2011, but by following year, the number remained similar. By contrast, number of international women represented around 14 that increased gradually during from 2010 to 2012, which ended up with only 20 international women students present in computer science class in UK.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-09-23 | Bikram12299 | 61 | view |
- Nowadays most people choose to throw away broken things instead of repairing them, and replace them with new ones. Why is this happening? What problems may it lead to? 73
- The bar chart below gives information about the percentage of the population living in urban areas in the world and in different continents. 78
- The chart below gives information about the number of social networking sites people used in Canada in 2014 and 2015. 73
- Life was better when technology was simpler. To what extent do you agree and disagree? 67
- The chart below gives information about the number of social networking sites people used in Canada in 2014 and 2015. 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, then
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 905.0 965.302439024 94% => OK
No of words: 168.0 196.424390244 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.3869047619 4.92477711251 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.60020574368 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94140986719 2.65546596893 111% => OK
Unique words: 95.0 106.607317073 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.565476190476 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 263.7 283.868780488 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 46.1519230369 43.030603864 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.555555556 112.824112599 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.6666666667 22.9334400587 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.44444444444 5.23603664747 28% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.314242725453 0.215688989381 146% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.134332878466 0.103423049105 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0846521419764 0.0843802449381 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.220549922042 0.15604864568 141% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0700257759683 0.0819641961636 85% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.2329268293 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 61.2550243902 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.98 11.4140731707 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.1 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.