The bar chart below gives information about vehicle ownership in China.
The provided infographic shows the number of cars per thousand capita in China for four different years with a 4-year interval: 1987, 1991, 1995 and 1999.
As can be seen, the number of car ownership by the Chinese increased dramatically for the given period. Initially, in 1987, there were only 250 cars per a thousand the Chinese, then this figure doubled in 1989. The ownership of car by the Chinese rose slightly between the years 1990 and 1993 from just over 500 vehicles to nearly 1000 units per capita.
Nevertheless, there was an abrupt increase in the number of cars owned by the Chinese by 1000 units every year starting from 2000 cars per a thousand the Chinese in 1995; this figure reached 3000 and 4000 vehicles per a thousand capita in 1997 and 1999, respectively.
The bar chart depicts the tremendous increase in the number of cars owned by the Chinese for a nearly decade between 1987 and 1999.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-04 | khanhkhanhlhp | view | |
| 2024-11-04 | khanhkhanhlhp | view | |
| 2024-11-04 | khanhkhanhlhp | view | |
| 2024-11-04 | khanhkhanhlhp | view | |
| 2024-11-04 | khanhkhanhlhp | 89 | view |
- The diagram below shows the number of houses built per year in two cities, Derby and Nottingham, between 2000 and 2009. 73
- Do you agree with the following statement? Parents are the best teachers. 61
- Should a city try to preserve its old, historic building or destroy them and replace them with modern buildings? What is your viewpoint on this issue? 89
- Some people claim that there are more disadvantages of the car than its advantages. Do you agree or disagree? Discuss advantages and disadvantages of having a car. 84
- Labour Arbitration Case between Canada Post Corporation and Canadian Union of Post Workers 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 94, Rule ID: A_RB_NN[1]
Message: You used an adverb ('nearly') instead an adjective, or a noun ('decade') instead of another adjective.
...number of cars owned by the Chinese for a nearly decade between 1987 and 1999.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, nevertheless, then
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 33.7804878049 71% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 757.0 965.302439024 78% => OK
No of words: 160.0 196.424390244 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.73125 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.55655882008 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.41963807986 2.65546596893 91% => OK
Unique words: 86.0 106.607317073 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.5375 0.547539520022 98% => OK
syllable_count: 212.4 283.868780488 75% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.1868039782 43.030603864 128% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.166666667 112.824112599 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.6666666667 22.9334400587 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.66666666667 5.23603664747 70% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0832291614253 0.215688989381 39% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0492842994828 0.103423049105 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0327186523448 0.0843802449381 39% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0582280841196 0.15604864568 37% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.027350632605 0.0819641961636 33% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.2329268293 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 70.47 61.2550243902 115% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.45 11.4140731707 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.59 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 27.0 40.7170731707 66% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.