The mixed graph illustrates the number of monthly average rainfall last year and 40 years ago in Australia.
In general, the bar and the line both had fluctuated proportions which had been changing constantly over period of months. It seems that the level of rainfall reduced compared to the old age of the last 40 years.
It can be seen clearly in the bars that durations with the highest average rainfall were included in the first 3 months of the year, which were from 60 to 70 mm. The rate dropped significantly in the next month with merely less than 20 mm and rose back to 38 mm in May. Nevertheless, Australia witnessed its reduction in rainfall ratio once again is the following months, particularly a drastical shrink in August and Octorber with only under 10 mm. Luckily, the last 2 months escalated the rates up to 38-40 mm that improved monthly totals for last year period.
Meanwhile, the line shows the similar predisposition in which the level was pretty buigh from the beginning then gradually decreased in the middle of the time and finally increased in the last 4 months, which has proven a higher rate of raifall 40 years ago in comparisons with last year (rose up back until 2 last months). Moreover, the summer month of April also expressed a curb figure, yet was still larger than last year with 30 mm. And in Octorber, the gap was unexpectedly huge with roughly 25 mm (much higher than under 10mm last year).
- The diagrams below show the life cycle of a species of large fish called the salmon Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- In spite of the advances made in agriculture many people around the world still go hungry Why is this the cases What can be done this problem 89
- Many manufactured food and drink products contain high levels of sugar which causes many health problems Sugary products should be made more expensive to encourage people to consume less sugar Do you agree or disagree 56
- Some people believe that it is best to accept a bad situation such as an unsatisfactory job or shortage of money Others argue that it is better to try and improve such situations Discuss both these views and give your opinion 56
- The graph below shows the quantities of goods transported in the UK between 1974 and 2002 by four different modes of transport Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant You should write at 89
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, first, if, may, moreover, nevertheless, so, still, then, while, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1177.0 965.302439024 122% => OK
No of words: 254.0 196.424390244 129% => OK
Chars per words: 4.63385826772 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.99216450694 3.73543355544 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55522730073 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 145.0 106.607317073 136% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.570866141732 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 336.6 283.868780488 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 65.2782505893 43.030603864 152% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.7 112.824112599 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.4 22.9334400587 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.9 5.23603664747 170% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.338410793265 0.215688989381 157% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.139671075001 0.103423049105 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.105137415922 0.0843802449381 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.220118033392 0.15604864568 141% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0945477902644 0.0819641961636 115% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.2329268293 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 71.48 61.2550243902 117% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.87 11.4140731707 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.11 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 40.7170731707 128% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.