The bar chart below shows the different types of accommodation chosen by the British when they went on holiday in 2010.
The bar chart illustrates the proportion of four kinds of holiday accommodation chosen by the British when they travelled to four parts of the world namely England, Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland in 2010
Overall, it is clear that hotel was the most popular accommodation in all countries. By contrast, the figure for camping was much lower. Additionally, although the British rarely chose caravan when they visited England, Scotland and wales, this figure was far higher in Northern Ireland.
Firstly, as can be seen from the chart that the percentage of Britains staying at self-catering sites occupied around 30% in England, Scotland and wales. However, this figure for Northern Ireland made up just over 10%. Meanwhile, approximately 55% visitors chose hotels when they travelled to england, this was followed by about 52% in scotland, compared to 49% and 45% for wales and northern ireland, respectively.
The figures for caravan in england, scotland and wales were much lower, making up 5%, 11%, 9%, respectively. The opposite was true for Northern ireland, where more than 30% Britains stayed at caravan. The other striking feature is that there were also minority of british tourists chose camping, the figure for this fluctuated from only 5% in Scotland to approximately around 10% in the three remaining nations
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-06-12 | minhtran224 | 84 | view |
| 2022-06-12 | minhtran224 | 84 | view |
| 2022-06-12 | minhtran224 | 84 | view |
| 2022-06-12 | minhtran224 | 78 | view |
| 2022-01-18 | Đại Phú | view |
- The bar chart below shows the different types of accommodation chosen by the British when they went on holiday in 2010 78
- Government investment in the arts such as music and theatre is a waste of money Governments must invest this money in public services instead To what extent do you agree with this statement 84
- Many developing countries are currently expanding their tourist industries Why is this the case Is it a positive development 78
- In the modern world people are no longer necessary to use food from animals or product from animals such as medicine and clothing To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
- In recent years the family structure has changed as well as family roles What are the changes occurring Do you think these changes are positive or negative 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 4, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
The bar chart illustrates the proportion of ...
^^
Line 1, column 211, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...land, Wales and Northern Ireland in 2010 Overall, it is clear that hotel was the ...
^^^
Line 4, column 202, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...re than 30% Britains stayed at caravan. The other striking feature is that there we...
^^^
Line 4, column 288, Rule ID: AFFORD_VBG[1]
Message: This verb is used with infinitive: 'to camp'.
Suggestion: to camp
...also minority of british tourists chose camping, the figure for this fluctuated from on...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, however, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 11.0 5.60731707317 196% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1119.0 965.302439024 116% => OK
No of words: 212.0 196.424390244 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.27830188679 4.92477711251 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.81578560438 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75556897525 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 121.0 106.607317073 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.570754716981 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 328.5 283.868780488 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 74.1995973501 43.030603864 172% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.333333333 112.824112599 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.5555555556 22.9334400587 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.44444444444 5.23603664747 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.141199997159 0.215688989381 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0578597260394 0.103423049105 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0911967365266 0.0843802449381 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.121743394523 0.15604864568 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.120267280611 0.0819641961636 147% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 13.2329268293 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 61.2550243902 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.64 11.4140731707 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.17 8.06136585366 114% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 40.7170731707 145% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.