The bar chart below shows the expenditure that people in two different countries spent on consumer goods in 2010.
The chart compares two different nations, namely France and UK, in terms of the amount of money that people spent on five categories in 2010
Overall, the proportion of spending on cars was the highest in two contries. In contrast, perfume was the kind of commodity that people in France and UK spent the least amount of money. In addition, it can be seen that British spent more money on consumer goods than people who live in France.
Regarding cars, the amount of money that peple in UK spent on it stood at approximately 450,000 pounds, which was higher than its in France/ that of France, at 400,000 pounds. Similarly, people in France did not spend on books as much as in England, with about 400,000 pounds compared to 300,000. Moreover, British spent around 350,000 pounds on cameras, doubling the figure of France
On the other hand, the spending on computers in France was more 25,000 pounds than that in UK. When its come to perfume, in France people used 200,000 whereas in British they spent only less than 150,000 pounds.
- The chart below shows information about the problems people have when they go to live in other countries 60
- The bar chart below shows the expenditure that people in two different countries spent on consumer goods in 2010 73
- Some people believe that the best way to encourage children that have a healthy diet at school and some people believe that parents should teach them to have a healthy diet Discuss both views and give your opinion 44
- The bar chart below shows the expenditure that people in two different countries spent on consumer goods in 2010 73
- The table below gives information on consumer spending on different items in five different countries in 2002 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 261, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... books as much as in England, with about 400,000 pounds compared to 300,000. More...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, moreover, regarding, similarly, whereas, in addition, in contrast, kind of, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 3.15609756098 285% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 11.0 5.60731707317 196% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 865.0 965.302439024 90% => OK
No of words: 181.0 196.424390244 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.77900552486 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.66791821706 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.30527799736 2.65546596893 87% => OK
Unique words: 99.0 106.607317073 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.546961325967 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 234.9 283.868780488 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 3.36585365854 238% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.9416504303 43.030603864 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.571428571 112.824112599 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.8571428571 22.9334400587 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 13.8571428571 5.23603664747 265% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.164653235035 0.215688989381 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0929437342511 0.103423049105 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0762719954578 0.0843802449381 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.134380970066 0.15604864568 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0927553611099 0.0819641961636 113% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.2329268293 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 71.48 61.2550243902 117% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.74 11.4140731707 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.32 8.06136585366 91% => OK
difficult_words: 28.0 40.7170731707 69% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.