The table below gives information on consumer spending on different items in five different countries in 2002
The table compares five different nations, namely Ireland, Italy, Spain, Sweden, Turkey, in terms of the expenditure that people spent on three categories in 2002
Overall, food/ drinks/ tobacco were the most consumer goods that people in all of five countries spent on. In contrast, leisure and education costs accounted for the lowest percentages in the table
As can be seen from the table, spending on food/ drinks/ tobacco in Turkey and Ireland was higher than that in others countries, with 32,14% and 28,91% respectively. While in Italy,Spain, Sweden, these figures were significant less, stood at only under 20%.Regarding to clothing/ footwear, the people of five countries spent around 5% to 9% among which Italian spent the highest proportion, at 9%.
On the other hand, the amount of money that people in five nations spent on entertainment and education was much less than other commodity, accounted for under 5%. Turkey made up the highest percentage with nearyly 5% whereas the least amount spent was in Spain, at 1,98%
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-04-30 | Ahmad_off | 84 | view |
| 2023-08-07 | .zin@ | 78 | view |
| 2023-06-25 | MiaMia_8786 | 56 | view |
| 2023-04-18 | minthu vũ | view | |
| 2023-04-13 | anhminhbnvn1 | 84 | view |
- Some people believe that the best way to encourage children that have a healthy diet at school and some people believe that parents should teach them to have a healthy diet Discuss both views and give your opinion 44
- The bar chart below shows the expenditure that people in two different countries spent on consumer goods in 2010 73
- The chart below shows information about the problems people have when they go to live in other countries 60
- The bar chart below shows the expenditure that people in two different countries spent on consumer goods in 2010 73
- The table below gives information on consumer spending on different items in five different countries in 2002 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 198, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... for the lowest percentages in the table As can be seen from the table, spending ...
^^^
Line 3, column 181, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , Spain
... and 28,91% respectively. While in Italy,Spain, Sweden, these figures were significant...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 258, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Regarding
...gnificant less, stood at only under 20%.Regarding to clothing/ footwear, the people of fi...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, regarding, whereas, while, in contrast, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 873.0 965.302439024 90% => OK
No of words: 168.0 196.424390244 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.19642857143 4.92477711251 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.60020574368 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.634310236 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 101.0 106.607317073 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.60119047619 0.547539520022 110% => OK
syllable_count: 248.4 283.868780488 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 5.0 8.94146341463 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 33.0 22.4926829268 147% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 61.7653624615 43.030603864 144% => OK
Chars per sentence: 174.6 112.824112599 155% => OK
Words per sentence: 33.6 22.9334400587 147% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.2 5.23603664747 233% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.142859966119 0.215688989381 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0714847735187 0.103423049105 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0795115057323 0.0843802449381 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.100534918193 0.15604864568 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0663507067738 0.0819641961636 81% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.9 13.2329268293 150% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.44 61.2550243902 76% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 10.3012195122 146% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.47 11.4140731707 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.22 8.06136585366 114% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 19.0 11.4329268293 166% => OK
gunning_fog: 15.2 10.9970731707 138% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.0658536585 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.