Given are the bar chart depicting the number of learners participating in several evening courses, namely drama, painting, sculpture, language at an education centre in 2009 and the pie chart contrasting the ages of these course attendees.
Perceptibly, female participants tended to choose language as their most favorite subject painting seemed to be the most attractive to male learners. It is also noticeable in the piethat the older learners were, the more studious they were.
Regarding the bar chart, while the figure for women taking language and drama classes were double in size compared to men with 40 and 20 respectively, the opposite was true for sculpture, with 10 male participants. In addition, although painting was the most chosen course among men learners, the figure for women taking this course was still 5 people higher.
When it comes to the pie chart, nearly a half of the number of attendees were 50 and the over-50s, while the opposite was true for the under-20s, with only 5%. Additionally, the proportion of age from 40 to 49 ranked third in term of people taking these classes, followed by that of people in theire twenties and thirties, at 16% and over one in ten respectively.
- The maps below show the changes that have taken place at the waterfront area of a town called Darwin between 2009 and 2014 78
- It is not necessary for people to travel to other places to learn about the culture We can learn as much as from books films and the Internet To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- The line graph shows the percentage of people accessing news from 4 sources 78
- Some people believe that a country will benefit greatly if its students study abroad To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- The diagram below shows how electricity is generated in a hydroelectric power station Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 7, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'is'.
Suggestion: is
Given are the bar chart depicting the number of l...
^^^
Line 3, column 92, Rule ID: ADJECTIVE_IN_ATTRIBUTE[1]
Message: A more concise phrase may lose no meaning and sound more powerful.
Suggestion: double
... taking language and drama classes were double in size compared to men with 40 and 20 respecti...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, regarding, so, still, third, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1009.0 965.302439024 105% => OK
No of words: 202.0 196.424390244 103% => OK
Chars per words: 4.99504950495 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76996954942 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77431413854 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 123.0 106.607317073 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.608910891089 0.547539520022 111% => OK
syllable_count: 306.9 283.868780488 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.07073170732 374% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 22.4926829268 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 46.9267775261 43.030603864 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 144.142857143 112.824112599 128% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.8571428571 22.9334400587 126% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.57142857143 5.23603664747 145% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.266447870425 0.215688989381 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.11610441165 0.103423049105 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.136625501195 0.0843802449381 162% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.172541595515 0.15604864568 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.158564163902 0.0819641961636 193% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.6 13.2329268293 125% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.52 61.2550243902 84% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.3012195122 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.31 11.4140731707 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.7 8.06136585366 108% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 40.7170731707 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.9970731707 120% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.