The bar chart below shows the passenger kilometres traveled by different means of transport in the UK in 1990 and 2000.
The bar graph compares the distances travelled by people in the UK using different means of transport in 1990 and 2000.
Overall, the total distance travelled by all modes of transport combined increased. The figures for bus and rail were significantly higher in both years compared to bicycles, motorbikes, and air travel.
In 1990, the figure for kilometres travelled by bus was highest, at around 40 billion kilometres, followed by rail with a slightly lower figure. By the year 2000, the distances covered by these two modes increased to the same level, each with approximately 45 billion kilometers.
The amount of kilometres travelled by bicycles, motorbikes and air transport, was incredibly low in 1990, with motorbikes covering the most distance of the three modes at around 10 billion passenger kilometers. In 2000, the figure for air travel rose to about 10 billion kilometers, in contrast to the decline seen in the other two modes. Finally, the total passenger kilometres increased from 100 billion to 112.5 billion kilometers in 2000.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-10-23 | Giang Tran | 78 | view |
| 2024-10-23 | Giang Tran | 67 | view |
| 2024-10-23 | Giang Tran | 73 | view |
| 2024-10-23 | Giang Tran | 73 | view |
| 2023-03-24 | hyst12 | 84 | view |
- The line graph illustrates the amount of fruit production in 4 countries such as France Spain Germany Turkey between 1970 and 2010 71
- The table shows data about what people in the UK thought the government should increase spending on 73
- The chart below shows the annual rice production in 4 countries in 1995 2005 2015 67
- The table below shows the questionnaire about opinions of club members and general public for the new theatre in one town in 2012 73
- Pop stars earn much more than classical music performers Discuss both views and give your opinion 56
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, if, in contrast, in contrast to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 889.0 965.302439024 92% => OK
No of words: 169.0 196.424390244 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.26035502959 4.92477711251 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.60555127546 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86990178625 2.65546596893 108% => OK
Unique words: 92.0 106.607317073 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.544378698225 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 263.7 283.868780488 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.0419391587 43.030603864 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.125 112.824112599 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.125 22.9334400587 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 5.23603664747 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.283010759746 0.215688989381 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.136949138797 0.103423049105 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.123834437301 0.0843802449381 147% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.207384446652 0.15604864568 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.143792238573 0.0819641961636 175% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.2329268293 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 61.2550243902 82% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.23 11.4140731707 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.6 8.06136585366 107% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.