The table below shows information about age average income per person and population below poverty line in three states in USA

The table illustrates data about age, per capita income and percentage of people below poverty line in California, Utah, Florida
The initial impression from the table is that the percentage of people under 18 years old is the highest in the state of Utah. In contrast, the population under over 60 in this state is the smallest. It is noticeable that in California, the average income per person takes up the highest percentage; however this state witnesses the largest proportion of poor people.
Utah ranks the first in population under 18 at 28 percent, following by California at 17 percent and Florida at 16%. On the contrary, the proportion of people over 60 in Florida is the highest at 23 percent which is almost 4 times higher than that in Utah and nearly twofold the figure for California at 13% .
In term of per capita income, California is the states with the highest average income per person (23000 dollars). Standing after it is Florida at 22000 dollars and Utah at 17000 dollars. However, population below poverty line in this state accounts for 16 percent, which is the largest in comparison with the other states: Florida and California at 9 percent and 12 percent respectively.

Votes
Average: 6.7 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 129, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...overty line in California, Utah, Florida The initial impression from the table is...
^^^
Line 4, column 307, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...twofold the figure for California at 13% . In term of per capita income, Califor...
^^
Line 5, column 322, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...est in comparison with the other states: Florida and California at 9 percent and ...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, so, in contrast, on the contrary

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 40.0 33.7804878049 118% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1001.0 965.302439024 104% => OK
No of words: 204.0 196.424390244 104% => OK
Chars per words: 4.9068627451 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.77926670891 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66108179798 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 98.0 106.607317073 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.480392156863 0.547539520022 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 312.3 283.868780488 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 62.1046244252 43.030603864 144% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.125 112.824112599 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.5 22.9334400587 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.5 5.23603664747 124% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 3.70975609756 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.240580302951 0.215688989381 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.114066142908 0.103423049105 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.096470807869 0.0843802449381 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.188576494693 0.15604864568 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.121702906037 0.0819641961636 148% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.2329268293 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 61.2550243902 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.3012195122 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.49 11.4140731707 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.05 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.