The bar chart below shows the percentage of Australian men and women in different age groups who did regular physical activity in 2010.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparison where relevant.
The bar graph demonstrates the percentage of Australian population doing ordinary physical activity in the year 2010. The information is divided by gender and age group as shown in graph.
For overview perspective, the numbers of females in almost all age groups were markedly bigger than one of the males in the same age. Only in the group of 15 to 24, the male’s percentage were significantly larger.
Looking at the male percentages, teenagers in the age of fifteen to twenty had their regular physical activities done in the highest percentage of all, as seen at 52.8% in the chart. On the other hand, the percentages of men in other groups remained relatively stable. 42.2%, 39.5, 43.1% are respectively depicted for the people in age of 25 to 34, 35 to 44 and 45 to 54 years. However, there was a small increase between the 45s and 65s shown as the growth from 45.1 to 48.7%.
On the contrary for the women, the percentage of people doing sports rose considerably when it came to the older age group. Although there was a sharp decrease to 47.1% in the group of 65 and older, the number grew significantly from 47.7 percent for age 15 to 24 to approximately 53 percent in the group of 45 to 64.
- The diagram below shows how electricity is generated in a hydroelectric power station. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 67
- The diagram below show the stages and equipment used in the cement making process and how cement is used to produce concrete for building purposes
- The chart below shows the results of a survey about people s coffee and tea buying and drinking habits in five Australian cities 57
- The graph shows the Underground Station passenger numbers in London Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- Some people think that taxation should be able to keep to a minimum as the money people earn should be theirs to do with as they wish Others believe that people should pay a significant level of tax in order to support the public services we all depend on 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, look, on the contrary, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 33.7804878049 124% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1008.0 965.302439024 104% => OK
No of words: 216.0 196.424390244 110% => OK
Chars per words: 4.66666666667 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.83365862548 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77134672214 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 125.0 106.607317073 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.578703703704 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 296.1 283.868780488 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.8099214119 43.030603864 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.8 112.824112599 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6 22.9334400587 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.3 5.23603664747 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.22405911395 0.215688989381 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.090857495405 0.103423049105 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0567441646554 0.0843802449381 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.141556206447 0.15604864568 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0568458519305 0.0819641961636 69% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 13.2329268293 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.81 11.4140731707 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.82 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.