The bar chart below shows the percentage of government spending on roads and transport in 4 countries in the years 1990, 1995, 2000, 2005.
The chart gives information about the investment of the government in road and transports in four different countries in 1990, 1995, 2000, and 2005.
Looking from an overall perspective, the Portugal government was responsible for the highest spending on infrastructure thought its figure followed a significant sink throughout the time frame.
As the chart portrays, there was a correlation between the figure of Italy and the UK when they both declined for the first term, those figures then reached the highest level before bottoming in the last year. During that process, they remained their distance by 10-15%.
On the other hand, road and transports in Portugal, which was spent approximately 26% initially, dropped its ratio to finish the study at precisely 20%. Meanwhile, the outlay for infrastructure in the USA contributed 11% of total expenditure in 1990, followed by a trivial fall to 10% then fluctuated upward to 15% in 2005. Despite being the only country whose proportion rose in the last examined year, Portugal still kept the third position in the research.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-03-04 | Sang Sang Sang | 80 | view |
| 2024-02-07 | Sang Sang Sang | 78 | view |
| 2024-02-07 | Sang Sang Sang | 73 | view |
| 2023-08-31 | chau hoang | 73 | view |
| 2022-12-09 | minh phương phạm hồng | 67 | view |
- The diagram below shows the average hours of unpaid work per week done by people in different categories Unpaid work refers to such activities as childcare in the home housework and gardening 84
- The bar chart shows the highest qualification attained by sex for the working age population in Wales in 2001 2002 78
- The graphs below show the types of music albums purchased by people in Britain according to sex and age 78
- The charts below show population statistics in two countries of the UK from 1700 to 2000 78
- The graph shows Internet usage in Taiwan by age group 56
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, look, still, then, third, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 909.0 965.302439024 94% => OK
No of words: 173.0 196.424390244 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.25433526012 4.92477711251 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.62669911048 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.881582608 2.65546596893 109% => OK
Unique words: 115.0 106.607317073 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.664739884393 0.547539520022 121% => OK
syllable_count: 259.2 283.868780488 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.756027983 43.030603864 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.857142857 112.824112599 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.7142857143 22.9334400587 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.42857142857 5.23603664747 180% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.245275617434 0.215688989381 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.105845713947 0.103423049105 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.134778808756 0.0843802449381 160% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.164559228933 0.15604864568 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.156925014776 0.0819641961636 191% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 13.2329268293 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 61.2550243902 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.47 11.4140731707 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.03 8.06136585366 112% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 40.7170731707 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.