The chart shows the average daily minimum and maximum levels of air pollutants in 4 cities 2000.
The graph gives information about the minimums and the maximum amount of two air pollutants per day regarding four big cities in 2000.
Looking from an overall perspective, Mexico city was responsible for the highest statistics in all segments. Whereas the levels of SO2 in Calcutta and Bejing were well ahead of No2, the reverse pattern was witnessed in Mexico City and Los Angeles.
In terms of daily SO2 released, this figure varied around 1 and 10 in Los Angeles, whilst it touched the minimum level in Mexico City at 55, as twofold less than the upper one. Also noteworthy is the fact that although kept a lower amount of the average minimum at precisely 25, Bejing still overstanding Calcutta in the climax level with approximately 125 and 57, respectively.
On the other hand, in Mexico City, at least 110 micrograms of NO2 can be found per day, nearly two times less than the peaks. Calcutta and Bejing had a similar top level of NO2 released at 50, but the disparity between them was 25 micrograms with 50 micrograms for the former. Turn to Los Angeles, which had the highest level on average of No2 amounted to 100 micrograms, released no less than 50 micrograms a day. That proves the most polluted atmosphere in four cities was presenced in Mexico city.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-08 | Mekata | view | |
| 2022-08-01 | nhinhi999 | 67 | view |
| 2021-10-13 | beauty flowers | 78 | view |
| 2021-03-07 | Viru Patel | 100 | view |
| 2019-12-26 | hungprok | 67 | view |
- the graph shows Internet Usage in Taiwan by Age Group 1998 2000 78
- The chart below shows the different levels of post school qualifications in Australia and the proportion of men and women who held them in 1999 50
- The graphs below show the types of music albums purchased by people in Britain according to sex and age 78
- The graph below shows information on employment rates across 6 countries in 1995 and 2005 73
- The bar chart below shows a survey of a group of young professionals aged 20 30 years who were asked to state which factors motivated them to succeed 80
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 177, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
...55, as twofold less than the upper one. Also noteworthy is the fact that although ke...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, look, regarding, so, still, well, whereas, at least, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1048.0 965.302439024 109% => OK
No of words: 221.0 196.424390244 113% => OK
Chars per words: 4.74208144796 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.85565412703 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58698511084 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 133.0 106.607317073 125% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.601809954751 0.547539520022 110% => OK
syllable_count: 323.1 283.868780488 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.3796918522 43.030603864 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.444444444 112.824112599 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.5555555556 22.9334400587 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.0 5.23603664747 172% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.230684644681 0.215688989381 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0968550153944 0.103423049105 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0785108889955 0.0843802449381 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.155921969514 0.15604864568 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0845061193678 0.0819641961636 103% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.2329268293 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 61.2550243902 91% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.51 11.4140731707 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.69 8.06136585366 108% => OK
difficult_words: 54.0 40.7170731707 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.