The bar chart below shows the percentage of people who ate five portion of fruit and vegetabls per day in UK ftom 2001 to 2008

This figure provides information about the 5 portion per day that UK people consume fruit and veggies from 2001 to 2008. This data divided into 3 different categories from children, women and men.

As we can see from the graph, the consumption for adult in 2006 reached the highest percentage while a lot of children ate more fruits and vegetables in 2007. In this graph, the tend was increasing since 2001 to 2006 and went down after 2007.

From 2001 to 2003, the percentage for women and children were stabilize, it counted ony 12 percent of children and 17 percent of women absorbed fiber. After 2004, the trend was gradually upward and reached the maximum amount for 22 percent of children and 27 percent for women in 2006. When 2007, the graph showed different trend, when women ate lest fiber and children consumption were rising. At the end, both women and children percentage declined in 2008.

On the other hand, men trend was growing from 2001 until 2006. Bu 2006, it hit the peak with more than 30 percentage men absorbed fruit and vegetables. Unfortunately, for the next 2 years, the trend went down as similar as women trend.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (2 votes)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 175, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
... and vegetables in 2007. In this graph, the tend was increasing since 2001 to 2006 and w...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 63, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'stabilized'.
Suggestion: stabilized
... percentage for women and children were stabilize, it counted ony 12 percent of children ...
^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, while, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 949.0 965.302439024 98% => OK
No of words: 199.0 196.424390244 101% => OK
Chars per words: 4.76884422111 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.75589349951 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.4113378315 2.65546596893 91% => OK
Unique words: 112.0 106.607317073 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.562814070352 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 257.4 283.868780488 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.07073170732 374% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.3534202466 43.030603864 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.2727272727 112.824112599 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0909090909 22.9334400587 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.90909090909 5.23603664747 56% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.152661214034 0.215688989381 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0679968441039 0.103423049105 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0832608289537 0.0843802449381 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.105791543453 0.15604864568 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0618502664421 0.0819641961636 75% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.1 13.2329268293 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 78.59 61.2550243902 128% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.8 10.3012195122 66% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.09 11.4140731707 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.15 8.06136585366 89% => OK
difficult_words: 33.0 40.7170731707 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 175, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
... and vegetables in 2007. In this graph, the tend was increasing since 2001 to 2006 and w...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 63, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'stabilized'.
Suggestion: stabilized
... percentage for women and children were stabilize, it counted ony 12 percent of children ...
^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, while, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 949.0 965.302439024 98% => OK
No of words: 199.0 196.424390244 101% => OK
Chars per words: 4.76884422111 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.75589349951 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.4113378315 2.65546596893 91% => OK
Unique words: 112.0 106.607317073 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.562814070352 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 257.4 283.868780488 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.07073170732 374% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.3534202466 43.030603864 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.2727272727 112.824112599 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0909090909 22.9334400587 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.90909090909 5.23603664747 56% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.152661214034 0.215688989381 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0679968441039 0.103423049105 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0832608289537 0.0843802449381 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.105791543453 0.15604864568 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0618502664421 0.0819641961636 75% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.1 13.2329268293 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 78.59 61.2550243902 128% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.8 10.3012195122 66% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.09 11.4140731707 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.15 8.06136585366 89% => OK
difficult_words: 33.0 40.7170731707 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.