The bar chart below shows the percentage of tourists to Thailand who visited four different attractions in Bangkok.
The bar chart given illustrates the information about the proportion of people visited various tourist attractions, namely Bangkok Zoo, Sea World, Wax Museum, China Town over the course 3 years from 2014 to 2017.
In general, the rate of tourists to the Sea World and Bangkok Zoo saw a downward trend compared with the other figures had an opposite trend over the same period.
Regarding the number of visitors, Sea World became the most popular tourist attraction in 2014, with 70%, was higher than the rate’s Bangkok Zoo by 20%. Subsequently, this number considerably declined to 20% over the next three years although there was a slight growth in 2016, about 50%. Similarly, the attraction’s Bangkok Zoo stood at 50% in 2014, then it continued to decrease moderately, just under 10% over the three years after going up substantially in 2016.
As for the rate of attraction, China Town was the least popular in 2014, only 19%, was lower than the figure for the Wax Museum, about 45%. However, it rapidly climbed to the highest point in the total number of tourists in 2016, at 100% before going down sharply in 2017, just under 10%. This was the same as this for the Wax Museum. There was a dramatic jump in the number of tourists from 2015 to 2016 before falling slightly to 70% in the next year. At this point, the Wax Museum was the most popular tourist attraction in Thailand in 2017.
- The graph below shows the unemployment rates in the US and Japan between March 1993 and March 1999.Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information shown below.» You should write at least 150 words. 73
- The table below shows the employment of students from four countries in the UK after their first courses in 2001 85
- The first chart below shows how energy is used in an average Australian household. The second chart shows the greenhouse gas emissions which result from this energy use.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make compa 84
- The graph shows data for annual sales revenue or turnover for three outdoor clothing companies from 2004 and 2014. 73
- The graph below shows the number of students from four different countries enrolled at Avago Language School in Sydney.Between 1990 and 2000 the composition of the student body changed and the Asian economic crisis seriously affected the overall number of 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, regarding, similarly, then, as for, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 1.0 6.8 15% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 33.7804878049 148% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1164.0 965.302439024 121% => OK
No of words: 244.0 196.424390244 124% => OK
Chars per words: 4.77049180328 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.95227774224 3.73543355544 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5254017218 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 130.0 106.607317073 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.532786885246 0.547539520022 97% => OK
syllable_count: 320.4 283.868780488 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.5034830098 43.030603864 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.4 112.824112599 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.4 22.9334400587 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.5 5.23603664747 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.132822100854 0.215688989381 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0592131858006 0.103423049105 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.054077896524 0.0843802449381 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0916514168782 0.15604864568 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0387121533745 0.0819641961636 47% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.2329268293 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 72.5 61.2550243902 118% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.68 11.4140731707 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.87 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 40.7170731707 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.