The bar graph below shows the percentage of tourists to Thailand who visited four different attractions in Bangkok.
The bar graph shows how many people visited four different Bangkok's attractions for each year from 2014 to 2017. The number of annual visitors varied in different ways for each of the four attractions, with a final decrease in 2017.
The annual number of tourists who visited Bangkok's Zoo went drastically down during the four years time. In 2014, 50% of foreign people choose to visit the zoo, but that rate dropped to 20% in just one year. Then, there was a small rise, to around 30% the next year. The smaller rate was registered in 2017, with less than 10% of tourists visiting Bangkok's zoo. Similarly, Sea World's visitors, that were 70% of the total in 2014, decreased to 45% in one year but rose in another year, rounding up to 50% in 2016. There has been a significant drop in 2017, when the lowest rate was registered, with only 20% of people visiting the attraction.
China Town's visitors rose significantly during the years, but as Sea World's and the Zoo's rates, the share dropped to its lowest point in 2017. Starting at 20% in 2014, China Town's share fourfolded in one year, reaching 80% in 2015. There was another significant rise in 2016, with a peak of 100% of visitors. Unfortunately, in 2017 only one-tenth of Bangkok's tourists decided to visit China Town.
Conversely, the only attraction to attract a high share of visitors was the Wax Museum. Starting at 45% in 2014, that number rose to almost 70% in 2015. Then again, there was another increase in 2016, up to 80%. In 2017, the visitor's share dropped slightly to just over 75%, making the wax museum the most visited attraction of the year.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...ctions, with a final decrease in 2017. The annual number of tourists who visited B...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, conversely, if, similarly, then
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 58.0 33.7804878049 172% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1330.0 965.302439024 138% => OK
No of words: 286.0 196.424390244 146% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.65034965035 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11236361783 3.73543355544 110% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.42849725233 2.65546596893 91% => OK
Unique words: 138.0 106.607317073 129% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.482517482517 0.547539520022 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 369.0 283.868780488 130% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 9.0 3.36585365854 267% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 8.94146341463 179% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 27.5156205636 43.030603864 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 83.125 112.824112599 74% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.875 22.9334400587 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.25 5.23603664747 43% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 3.70975609756 270% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.203028631265 0.215688989381 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0754227948937 0.103423049105 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.100908735089 0.0843802449381 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.138683917167 0.15604864568 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0908109585558 0.0819641961636 111% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.4 13.2329268293 71% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 79.6 61.2550243902 130% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.4 10.3012195122 62% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.39 11.4140731707 82% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.85 8.06136585366 85% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.