The given bar chart provides data on a wide range of factors affecting work performance of workers in two different age brackets
Overall, money and personal development were the two factors that had the biggest impact on performance at work of two age groups, whereas the smallest influence was seen in the factor of work environment.
For the 18-30 age category, chance for personal development had the highest impact on job efficiency, reaching at around 100% compared to relaxed working environment and promotion prospects, which altogether take the second place in impact at 80%. These were followed by the factors of team spirit, job satisfaction and competent boss at 60%, 57% and 55% respectively.
The remaining age group saw money as the greatest incentive for work efficacy, standing at around 70%. Team morale came in second in terms of impact at 60%, which was followed by the impact from competent boss (just over 50%). Promotion prospects and job contentment both accounted for exactly 50% of the influence.
- The chart below shows the expenditure of two countries on consumer goods in 2010 73
- The bar chart below shows the results of a survey conducted by a personnel department at a major company The survey was carried out on two groups of workers those aged from 18 30 and those aged 45 60 and shows factors affecting their work performance 78
- The pie chart gives information on UAE government spending in 2000 The total budget was AED 315 billion Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, second, so, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 3.97073170732 302% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 863.0 965.302439024 89% => OK
No of words: 167.0 196.424390244 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.16766467066 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.59483629437 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78411562181 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 98.0 106.607317073 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.586826347305 0.547539520022 107% => OK
syllable_count: 253.8 283.868780488 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 3.36585365854 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 91.344433632 43.030603864 212% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 143.833333333 112.824112599 127% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.8333333333 22.9334400587 121% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.83333333333 5.23603664747 73% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.238629994968 0.215688989381 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.105675120483 0.103423049105 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0851949066448 0.0843802449381 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.167443966447 0.15604864568 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0570468617425 0.0819641961636 70% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.8 13.2329268293 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.53 61.2550243902 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.6 10.3012195122 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.0 11.4140731707 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.23 8.06136585366 114% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 19.0 11.4329268293 166% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.