The given bar chart represents the amount of money spent by citizens on 5 consumer goods in France and the UK in 2010
It is clear that UK citizens' spending was significantly higher that their France counterparts. The significant difference in expenditure was seen on cameras and books. However, perfume and computers were slightly more popular in France compared to the UK.
In terms of cars, UK citizens spent about 450000 pounds on this as opposed to around 400000 pounds in France. UK spending was also higher in books and cameras (around 450000 pounds and 350000 pounds) compared to France expenditure (just 300000 pounds and 150000 pounds respectively). However, the biggest gap was seen on cameras. with UK's figure for camera almost doubled that of France.
On the other hand, the amount of money on the remaining goods was higher in France. France's spending on computers was recorded at exactly 360,000 pounds, slightly higher than that of UK (350,000 pounds). Similarly, France's figure for perfume was 200,000 pounds, with the equivalent figure for the UK was almost 150,000 pounds, respectively.
- The pie chart gives information on UAE government spending in 2000 The total budget was AED 315 billion Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- The bar chart below shows the results of a survey conducted by a personnel department at a major company The survey was carried out on two groups of workers those aged from 18 30 and those aged 45 60 and shows factors affecting their work performance 78
- The chart below shows the expenditure of two countries on consumer goods in 2010 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 327, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: With
...r, the biggest gap was seen on cameras. with UKs figure for camera almost doubled th...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, similarly, so, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 929.0 965.302439024 96% => OK
No of words: 180.0 196.424390244 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.16111111111 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.66284150148 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61342096414 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 90.0 106.607317073 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.5 0.547539520022 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 257.4 283.868780488 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 49.9579823452 43.030603864 116% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.9 112.824112599 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0 22.9334400587 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.1 5.23603664747 97% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0686847542112 0.215688989381 32% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0304973726672 0.103423049105 29% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.046257406898 0.0843802449381 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0739112763433 0.15604864568 47% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0902963837578 0.0819641961636 110% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.2329268293 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 61.2550243902 114% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.35 11.4140731707 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.9 8.06136585366 86% => OK
difficult_words: 27.0 40.7170731707 66% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.