The bar graph compares the electricity production and consumption in 2014 between ten countries, where the figures were the biggest in the world. Overall, there were two countries, namely China and the USA, with the most different numbers from others.
It can be seen from the chart that production of the electricity was considerably more than consumption by approximately 100-200 billion kilowatt-hour. However, three entries from the ranking did not follow this trend, specifically, China with a difference of 76 kWh, the Republic of Korea with 35.6 kWh, and Russia with only 19 kWh gap. Additionally, Germany had the opposite situation, where consumption is greater than production, at 582.5 and 526.6.
Speaking of ranking, two leaders of it had significantly higher numbers in comparison with the remaining options. China produced 5,398 and consumed 5,322 kWh of electricity and exceeded Russia's figures by five times, whereas the United States had 4,099 and 3,866, which is four times higher than in Russia.
- Some people say that History is one of the most important school subjects Others think that in today s world subjects like science and technology are more important than History Discuss both these views and give your opinion 84
- In spite of the advances made in agriculture many people around the world still go hungry Why is this the case What can be done about this problem 61
- The chart below shows the percentage of households in owned and rented accommodation in England and Wales between 1918 and 2011 65
- Some people believe that nowadays we have too many choices To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 89
- The plans below show the layout of a university s sports centre now and how it will look after redevelopment Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 325, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'gap' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'gaps'.
Suggestion: gaps
...ith 356 kWh and Russia with only 19 kWh gap Additionally Germany had the opposite s...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, so, whereas, speaking of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 23.0 33.7804878049 68% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 830.0 965.302439024 86% => OK
No of words: 160.0 196.424390244 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.1875 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.55655882008 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81399960021 2.65546596893 106% => OK
Unique words: 99.0 106.607317073 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.61875 0.547539520022 113% => OK
syllable_count: 243.0 283.868780488 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 3.36585365854 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 1.0 8.94146341463 11% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 160.0 22.4926829268 711% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 0.0 43.030603864 0% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 830.0 112.824112599 736% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 160.0 22.9334400587 698% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 37.0 5.23603664747 707% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.156283418202 0.215688989381 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.156283418202 0.103423049105 151% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0843802449381 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.112623402976 0.15604864568 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0721374006438 0.0819641961636 88% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 83.0 13.2329268293 627% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: -82.46 61.2550243902 -135% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 0.0 6.51609756098 0% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 64.5 10.3012195122 626% => Flesch kincaid grade is high.
coleman_liau_index: 14.01 11.4140731707 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 15.62 8.06136585366 194% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 58.0 11.4329268293 507% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 66.0 10.9970731707 600% => Gunning_fog is high.
text_standard: 58.0 11.0658536585 524% => The average readability is very high. Good job!
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 325, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'gap' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'gaps'.
Suggestion: gaps
...ith 356 kWh and Russia with only 19 kWh gap Additionally Germany had the opposite s...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, so, whereas, speaking of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 23.0 33.7804878049 68% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 830.0 965.302439024 86% => OK
No of words: 160.0 196.424390244 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.1875 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.55655882008 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81399960021 2.65546596893 106% => OK
Unique words: 99.0 106.607317073 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.61875 0.547539520022 113% => OK
syllable_count: 243.0 283.868780488 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 3.36585365854 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 1.0 8.94146341463 11% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 160.0 22.4926829268 711% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 0.0 43.030603864 0% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 830.0 112.824112599 736% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 160.0 22.9334400587 698% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 37.0 5.23603664747 707% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.156283418202 0.215688989381 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.156283418202 0.103423049105 151% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0843802449381 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.112623402976 0.15604864568 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0721374006438 0.0819641961636 88% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 83.0 13.2329268293 627% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: -82.46 61.2550243902 -135% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 0.0 6.51609756098 0% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 64.5 10.3012195122 626% => Flesch kincaid grade is high.
coleman_liau_index: 14.01 11.4140731707 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 15.62 8.06136585366 194% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 58.0 11.4329268293 507% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 66.0 10.9970731707 600% => Gunning_fog is high.
text_standard: 58.0 11.0658536585 524% => The average readability is very high. Good job!
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.