The bar chart compares the recycling rates of four different kinds of waste material in a city, from 1992 to 2002.
The change in four various waste materials recycled in a city from 1992 to 2002 is displayed in the bar chart, shown in percentage.
Overall, glass was the most popular material to process among other waste in this town. Furthermore, all kinds of waste were year-to-year likely to recycle.
Initially, the most well-known type of waste processed in the city was glass material, showing the highest rate at about 15%, followed by paper one at only around 13%. When it comes to the figure for cans, it was lower than that for plastic, accounting for approximately 8% and one in ten, respectively.
Eventually, the proportion of recycled glass increased dramatically, breaking a record as the maximum data observed in the city, with a half. Moreover, that of paper experienced a significant upward trend to two fifths, while that of cans increased to more than twofold at a fifth. Turning to the remaining material, its figure inclined to 12% virtually, being the lowest figure in the eventual period.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, if, moreover, well, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 1.0 6.8 15% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 843.0 965.302439024 87% => OK
No of words: 167.0 196.424390244 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.04790419162 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.59483629437 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83876547253 2.65546596893 107% => OK
Unique words: 108.0 106.607317073 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.646706586826 0.547539520022 118% => OK
syllable_count: 255.6 283.868780488 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 29.6900656786 43.030603864 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.375 112.824112599 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.875 22.9334400587 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.75 5.23603664747 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 1.13902439024 351% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.24947409382 0.215688989381 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.103448217962 0.103423049105 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.165594101477 0.0843802449381 196% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.18316003946 0.15604864568 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.203574411753 0.0819641961636 248% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.2329268293 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 61.2550243902 97% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.01 11.4140731707 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.88 8.06136585366 110% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.