The graph below shows the percentage of immigrants to Australia from five countries in 1962, 1982 and 2002
The given bar chart illustrates changes in the immigration to Australia from five nations from 1962 to 2002
Overall, there was a significant variation in the proportion of people moving to Australia. Initially, Italy had the biggest figure for immigrants to Australia but at the end of the period, immigrants were evenly contributed by all five regions
It is evident from the chart that the percentage of residents in Australia came from Italy and New Zealand followed a similar trend and both experienced a downward pattern. Starting at 40% in 1962, the data of Italian immigrating to Australia witnessed almost a threefold decrease to 15% in 2002. The same pattern can be seen for New Zealanders, with the figure dropping from 8% to 5% between 1962 and 2002.
A significant growth was seen in India, in 1962, Indian immigrants had the lowest percentage at 2%, before reaching 14% in 2002. Moreover, the UK and Vietnam were equally represented as settlers to Australia in 1962. The proportion Vietnamese emigrants exceeded the UK and ended at 13% in 2002 compared to 10% in 1962.
- The graph below shows the percentage of immigrants to Australia from five countries in 1962 1982 and 2002 56
- The bar chart below shows the passenger kilometres traveled by different means of transport in the UK in 1990 and 2000 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The bar chart describes the sales of different goods in pounds in the UK over four seasons in 2015 87
- The government should spend more money on medical research to protect citizens health rather than on protecting the environment Do you agree or disagree 67
- Some people believe that the salaries paid to professional sports people are too high while others argue that sports salaries are fair Discuss both views and give your opinion 89
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, moreover
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 7.85571142285 13% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 7.30460921844 14% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 2.0 24.0651302605 8% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 912.0 1615.20841683 56% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 182.0 315.596192385 58% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.01098901099 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.67297393991 4.20363070211 87% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8720027771 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 106.0 176.041082164 60% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.582417582418 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 265.5 506.74238477 52% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 16.0721442886 44% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 78.7861999726 49.4020404114 159% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.285714286 106.682146367 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.0 20.7667163134 125% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.42857142857 7.06120827912 34% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 8.67935871743 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.370088437992 0.244688304435 151% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.172308485645 0.084324248473 204% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0688539323763 0.0667982634062 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.244895293963 0.151304729494 162% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0772723315797 0.056905535591 136% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 13.0946893788 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 50.2224549098 107% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 12.4159519038 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.26 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 78.4519038076 64% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 19.0 9.78957915832 194% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.