The line chart gives information about the life expectancy of people residing in different regions in the continent of Asia from 1950 and makes a prediction about the life expectancy till 2300.
As can be seen from the graph the life expectancy of people living in other eastern Asia, experienced a dramatic rise from about 52 years to approximately 78 years in 2000 and is projected to grow steadily till 2300 and reach over 100 years.
Although Chinese people did not live long in 1950, only 40 years on average their life expectancy racketed up to 70 years in 2000. This figure has been moderately increasing since 2000 and will have reached just under 100 by 2300.
The life expectancy of the dwellers of Western Asia was 45 in 1950 and is predicted to go up to 70 years in 2050 This figure will increase steadily for 250 years and reach 93 years by the end of the period shown.
The life expectancy of the people in habiting India, Other south central Asia and South eastern Asia was the same, 40 years, in 1950. fallowing the same upward trend for 350 years, residents of these regions are projected to live around 90 years in 2300.
Overall, there is only one upward trend in the life expectancy of the people living in different regions over the period given with Western Asia easily out numbering the other regions.
- The table shows the number of mobile phones sold in millions for a period of six years.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 73
- The Graph below shows average carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions per person in the United Kindom, Sweden, Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 78
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of Australian men and women in different age groups who did regular physical activity in 2010 61
- The table shows the number of mobile phones sold in millions for a period of six years Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- Weekly earnings of full time graduate employees by type of degree and age 64
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 134, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Fallowing
...n Asia was the same, 40 years, in 1950. fallowing the same upward trend for 350 years, re...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, well
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 1.00243902439 299% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 33.7804878049 142% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1096.0 965.302439024 114% => OK
No of words: 236.0 196.424390244 120% => OK
Chars per words: 4.64406779661 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.91947592106 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.36942848053 2.65546596893 89% => OK
Unique words: 120.0 106.607317073 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.508474576271 0.547539520022 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 324.0 283.868780488 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 29.0 22.4926829268 129% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 47.1062628533 43.030603864 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 137.0 112.824112599 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.5 22.9334400587 129% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.5 5.23603664747 29% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 6.0 3.83414634146 156% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.175914247831 0.215688989381 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0929976039919 0.103423049105 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0896404525652 0.0843802449381 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.115576941594 0.15604864568 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0868713619938 0.0819641961636 106% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 13.2329268293 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.96 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.2 10.3012195122 118% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.22 11.4140731707 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.55 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 19.0 11.4329268293 166% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.9970731707 124% => OK
text_standard: 19.0 11.0658536585 172% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.