The Graph below shows average carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions per person in the United Kindom, Sweden, Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

the graph indicates informatin on the changes in the amounts of CO2 a person emitted on average in 4 countries (the United Kingdom, Sweden, Italy and Portugal) between 1967 and 2007.
As can be seen from the chart Portugal experienced a sharp rise from 1 metric tonnes in 1967 to just over 5 metric tonnes in 1997.after that amount of carbon dioxide emissions per person was steady almost 5.2 metric tonnes by the end of period.
The most notable feature was that the U.K maintained its high emission to the throughout of the period with its peak in 1967 when 11 metric tonnes was the volume of carbon dioxide emissions per person to about 9 metric tonnes in 2007.
In Italy in the beginning of the period was a bit higher than 4. However, it increased only till 7.8 by 2007. As regards Sweden, the figure for average CO2 emissions per person increased between 1967 and 1977, when it peaked at just over 10 metric tonnes. Then it steeply decreased until 1987, followed by a gradul decline until 2007.In 2007 the emission in Sweden was at the same level with Portugal around 5.5.
There are two trends visible in the date. United Kingdom and Sweden experimented Steady fall while Portugal and Italy climbed significantly.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
the graph indicates informatin on the chang...
^^^
Line 3, column 40, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: K
...The most notable feature was that the U.K maintained its high emission to the thr...
^
Line 4, column 334, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: In
...followed by a gradul decline until 2007.In 2007 the emission in Sweden was at the ...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, so, then, while, as regards

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 42.0 33.7804878049 124% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1011.0 965.302439024 105% => OK
No of words: 214.0 196.424390244 109% => OK
Chars per words: 4.72429906542 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82475343497 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.40205552206 2.65546596893 90% => OK
Unique words: 118.0 106.607317073 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.551401869159 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 301.5 283.868780488 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.07073170732 374% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 71.191642768 43.030603864 165% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.375 112.824112599 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.75 22.9334400587 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 5.23603664747 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.297631923814 0.215688989381 138% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.136748909364 0.103423049105 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0880073353005 0.0843802449381 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.179462397839 0.15604864568 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0834992584825 0.0819641961636 102% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.2329268293 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 62.01 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.39 11.4140731707 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.25 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 11.4329268293 157% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 18.0 11.0658536585 163% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.