The bar chart illustrates the amount of money spent on three different kinds of clothes per person in the US from 1985 to 2005 It is evident that women and men spend on attire more than boys and girls Besides the average expenditure on clothes grew gradua

Essay topics:

The bar chart illustrates the amount of money spent on three different kinds of clothes per person in the US from 1985 to 2005.

It is evident that women and men spend on attire more than boys and girls. Besides, the average expenditure on clothes grew gradually over a period given, apart from that on men's clothes.

Regarding the outfits of boys and girls, the average spending was less than $200 per person most of the year. There was a leveling off at about $100 during the period of 20 years. In contrast, girl's clothes saw an upward trend from 100$ in 1985 to around $150 in 2005.

Starting at approximately $300 in 1985, the expenditure on men's clothes soared to more than $400 in 1995, before falling to exactly $400 in the final year. In terms of women's attires, the average spending was always highest in most of the years. There was just nearly $500 in the initial years, the figure rose sharply to above $600 at the end of the given period.

The bar chart illustrates the amount of money spent on three different kinds of clothes per person in the US from 1985 to 2005.

It is evident that women and men spend on attire more than boys and girls. Besides, the average expenditure on clothes grew gradually over a period given, apart from that on men's clothes.

Regarding the outfits of boys and girls, the average spending was less than $200 per person most of the year. There was a leveling off at about $100 during the period of 20 years. In contrast, girl's clothes saw an upward trend from 100$ in 1985 to around $150 in 2005.

Starting at approximately $300 in 1985, the expenditure on men's clothes soared to more than $400 in 1995, before falling to exactly $400 in the final year. In terms of women's attires, the average spending was always highest in most of the years. There was just nearly $500 in the initial years, the figure rose sharply to above $600 at the end of the given period.

Votes
Average: 6.1 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2020-11-03 nuvuong98 61 view
2020-11-03 nuvuong98 78 view
Essays by user nuvuong98 :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 229, Rule ID: CURRENCY[1]
Message: The currency mark is usually put at the beginning of the number: '$100'.
Suggestion: $100
... girls clothes saw an upward trend from 100$ in 1985 to around 50 in 2005. Starti...
^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, if, regarding, so, apart from, in contrast

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 33.7804878049 124% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 772.0 965.302439024 80% => OK
No of words: 174.0 196.424390244 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.4367816092 4.92477711251 90% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.63192868298 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.25202306254 2.65546596893 85% => OK
Unique words: 97.0 106.607317073 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.557471264368 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 223.2 283.868780488 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 24.7914760341 43.030603864 58% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 85.7777777778 112.824112599 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.3333333333 22.9334400587 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.66666666667 5.23603664747 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 3.70975609756 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.453137016581 0.215688989381 210% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.193369988269 0.103423049105 187% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.18036253989 0.0843802449381 214% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.329889670772 0.15604864568 211% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.192840914342 0.0819641961636 235% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.1 13.2329268293 69% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 77.57 61.2550243902 127% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 10.3012195122 70% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.47 11.4140731707 74% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.03 8.06136585366 87% => OK
difficult_words: 27.0 40.7170731707 66% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.