The bar chart illustrates the amount of money spent on three different kinds of clothes per person in the US from 1985 to 2005.
It is evident that women and men spend on attire more than boys and girls. Besides, the average expenditure on clothes grew gradually over a period given, apart from that on men's clothes.
Regarding the outfits of boys and girls, the average spending was less than 200$ per person most of the year. There was a leveling off at about 100$ during the period of 20 years. In contrast, girl's clothes saw an upward trend from 100$ in 1985 to around 150$ in 2005.
Starting at approximately 300$ in 1985, the expenditure on men's clothes soared to more than 400$ in 1995, before falling to exactly 400$ in the final year. In terms of women's attires, the average spending was always highest in most of the years. There was just nearly 500$ in the initial years, the figure rose sharply to above 600$ at the end of the given period.
The bar chart illustrates the amount of money spent on three different kinds of clothes per person in the US from 1985 to 2005.
It is evident that women and men spend on attire more than boys and girls. Besides, the average expenditure on clothes grew gradually over a period given, apart from that on men's clothes.
Regarding the outfits of boys and girls, the average spending was less than 200$ per person most of the year. There was a leveling off at about 100$ during the period of 20 years. In contrast, girl's clothes saw an upward trend from 100$ in 1985 to around 150$ in 2005.
Starting at approximately 300$ in 1985, the expenditure on men's clothes soared to more than 400$ in 1995, before falling to exactly 400$ in the final year. In terms of women's attires, the average spending was always highest in most of the years. There was just nearly 500$ in the initial years, the figure rose sharply to above 600$ at the end of the given period.
- People have different views about factors leading to people s achievements While I agree that material wealth and physical appearance are essential I believe that diligence and persistence are more significant On the one hand it is no doubt true that mone 89
- Nowadays numerous young people are less happy even though they have become richer healthier and have longevity While there is a number of underlining reasons for this phenomenon some solutions can be taken to tackle this issue There are two primary reason 84
- The pie charts compare the water usage of various sectors of the economy in Sydney in two years 1997 and 2007 Overall it is clear that the sector which used the highest percentage of water was the food industry The percentage of total water use by the ser
- It is obvious that nowadays there is an increasing number of people purchasing well known designer labels of consumer products While this trend can account for some primary reasons I strongly believe that this is a negative tendency There are two principa 78
- The pie charts given illustrate how much water was used in percentage over two the year 1997 and 2007 in Sydney Australia Overall it is evident that the food industry accounted for the largest proportion of total water in both years Besides the amount of 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 77, Rule ID: CURRENCY[1]
Message: The currency mark is usually put at the beginning of the number: '$200'.
Suggestion: $200
...rls, the average spending was less than 200$ per person most of the year. There was ...
^^^^
Line 5, column 145, Rule ID: CURRENCY[1]
Message: The currency mark is usually put at the beginning of the number: '$100'.
Suggestion: $100
...year. There was a leveling off at about 100$ during the period of 20 years. In contr...
^^^^
Line 5, column 233, Rule ID: CURRENCY[1]
Message: The currency mark is usually put at the beginning of the number: '$100'.
Suggestion: $100
... girls clothes saw an upward trend from 100$ in 1985 to around 150$ in 2005. Star...
^^^^
Line 5, column 256, Rule ID: CURRENCY[1]
Message: The currency mark is usually put at the beginning of the number: '$150'.
Suggestion: $150
...pward trend from 100$ in 1985 to around 150$ in 2005. Starting at approximately 3...
^^^^
Line 7, column 27, Rule ID: CURRENCY[1]
Message: The currency mark is usually put at the beginning of the number: '$300'.
Suggestion: $300
...$ in 2005. Starting at approximately 300$ in 1985, the expenditure on mens clothe...
^^^^
Line 7, column 93, Rule ID: CURRENCY[1]
Message: The currency mark is usually put at the beginning of the number: '$400'.
Suggestion: $400
...ure on mens clothes soared to more than 400$ in 1995, before falling to exactly 400$...
^^^^
Line 7, column 133, Rule ID: CURRENCY[1]
Message: The currency mark is usually put at the beginning of the number: '$400'.
Suggestion: $400
...400$ in 1995, before falling to exactly 400$ in the final year. In terms of womens a...
^^^^
Line 7, column 269, Rule ID: CURRENCY[1]
Message: The currency mark is usually put at the beginning of the number: '$500'.
Suggestion: $500
...ost of the years. There was just nearly 500$ in the initial years, the figure rose s...
^^^^
Line 7, column 329, Rule ID: CURRENCY[1]
Message: The currency mark is usually put at the beginning of the number: '$600'.
Suggestion: $600
...years, the figure rose sharply to above 600$ at the end of the given period.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, if, regarding, so, apart from, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 33.7804878049 124% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 788.0 965.302439024 82% => OK
No of words: 174.0 196.424390244 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.52873563218 4.92477711251 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.63192868298 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.19353594617 2.65546596893 83% => OK
Unique words: 101.0 106.607317073 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.580459770115 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 223.2 283.868780488 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 25.8590672304 43.030603864 60% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.5555555556 112.824112599 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.3333333333 22.9334400587 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.66666666667 5.23603664747 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 9.0 1.69756097561 530% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 3.70975609756 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.50185738239 0.215688989381 233% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.195023274954 0.103423049105 189% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.179945034536 0.0843802449381 213% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.335119604514 0.15604864568 215% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.187285764442 0.0819641961636 228% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.6 13.2329268293 73% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 77.57 61.2550243902 127% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 10.3012195122 70% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.99 11.4140731707 79% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.03 8.06136585366 87% => OK
difficult_words: 27.0 40.7170731707 66% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.