The bar chart illustrates the percentage of adults who were overweight or obese between 1965 to 2015, while the pie chart demonstrates the part of adults who were overweight, obese, severely obese, and healthy or underweight in 2015.
The bar chart provides an overview of the percentage of adults categorized as overweight or obese from 1965 to 2015, while the accompanying pie chart details the distribution of adults in various weight categories in the year 2015.
In general, there was a steady increase in the proportion of overweight and obese adults between 1965 and 2015, and the data for 2015 indicates a significant prevalence of overweight and obesity in the adult population.
Notably, there were two distinct periods of substantial growth in the percentage of adults classified as overweight or obese. The first occurred between 1985 and 1995, with a rise of approximately 12%. This means that the percentage increased from around 50% in 1985 to 60% in 1995. The second notable surge was observed between 1995 and 2015, with an increase of about 20%. By 2015, this figure had reached just under 80%.
The pie chart presents four distinct weight categories for adults in 2015. Approximately 30% of adults fell into each of the "overweight," "obese," and "healthy or underweight" categories. However, a notable deviation was seen in the "severely obese" category, which constituted 6% of the total population.
To summarize, the bar and pie charts collectively demonstrate a consistent upward trend in the proportion of overweight and obese adults over the decades, culminating in a significant prevalence in 2015. The pie chart further illustrates the distribution of adults across various weight categories in that year.
- Students leave high school without learning how to manage their money What are the reasons and solutions for this issue 56
- The chart below shows information about fuel used in transport sector in 6 EU countries compared to the average
- The table below presents the food consumption per person weekly in a European country in 1992 2002 and 2012 78
- The table below shows expenditures on advertising of four car companies in the UK in 2002
- In many nations people in huge cities either live alone or in small family units instead of in large extended family groups Is this a positive or negative trend 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 142, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , &apos
...s fell into each of the 'overweight,' 'obese,' and 'healthy o...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 161, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , &apos
... the 'overweight,' 'obese,' and 'healthy or underweight'...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, second, while, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 6.8 176% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 33.7804878049 133% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 3.97073170732 227% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1324.0 965.302439024 137% => OK
No of words: 239.0 196.424390244 122% => OK
Chars per words: 5.53974895397 4.92477711251 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.93187294222 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.46066841902 2.65546596893 130% => OK
Unique words: 121.0 106.607317073 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.506276150628 0.547539520022 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 386.1 283.868780488 136% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 58.4343767733 43.030603864 136% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.333333333 112.824112599 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.9166666667 22.9334400587 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.16666666667 5.23603664747 80% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.482712491557 0.215688989381 224% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.168498301055 0.103423049105 163% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.137653446199 0.0843802449381 163% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.296809083778 0.15604864568 190% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.119832807599 0.0819641961636 146% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.2329268293 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 61.2550243902 85% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.85 11.4140731707 130% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.28 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 40.7170731707 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.0658536585 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.