The chart below shows waste collection by a recycling centre from 2011 to 2015
The bar chart compares the variation in levels in different years in terms of promotion of the quantity of tons of waste collected by a recycling company between 2011 and 2015.
In general, four types of waste were promoted over the year. Specifically, each percentage of waste did not show a significant difference at the beginning and the end.
Initially, paper and glass variations were around 57% and 48% respectively, which is markedly higher than tins and garden in 2011. Moreover, in the following year, all types of tons of waste had a tendency to rapidly decreased and got the lowest point of each type over the period.
Continuing for the rest of the period, the percentage of paper continued to rise to the end and reached a peak of 70%. For a while, the remaining three components witnessed fluctuation. Particularly in 2013, all of them steadily decreased until 2015 and grew to 52%, 39% and 35% in 2015, respectively.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-06-23 | Trần Ánh Vy | 67 | view |
| 2024-06-15 | Zahid6400 | 56 | view |
| 2024-06-13 | lavien | 84 | view |
| 2024-06-10 | nguyendangquang.aspect | 80 | view |
| 2024-05-21 | nguyenanhquan | 11 | view |
- Scientific research should be carried out and controlled by the government rather than private companies To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
- The table below presents the food consumption per person weekly in a European country in 1992 2002 and 2012 78
- Some people think the government funding should not be used for supporting art and culture while others think supporting cultural activities may be beneficial for the population and the culture Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 61
- Nowadays it is not only large companies that are able to make films as digital technology enables anyone to produce films Do you think this is a positive or negative development 56
- In many nations people in huge cities either live alone or in small family units instead of in large extended family groups Is this a positive or negative trend 61