The bar chart provides information about how often people in the USA spent ate fast food from 2003 to 2013.
The given bar chart details information about the frequency of fast-food consumption by the American from 2003 to 2013.
Overall, most people tend to eat junk once a week but afterward their preference had clearly altered and got into the habit of eating fast food once or twice a month. Additionally, the proportion of people who never consumed instant refreshments declined throughout the period.
The figure for those eating junk food once a week began at roughly 31% in the first year, followed a steady rise by 4% in 2003 and finally ended at about 27% in 2006. Similarly, the proportion of America citizens eating instant refreshments once or twice a week was at 30% in 2003, witnessed a slight decrease and rebounded to about 34% in 2006.
Approximately 17% of American ate junk food several times weekly and rose to 20% in the next two years before falling back to about 16% in 2006. The percentage of people in the USA who consumed fast food every day and never was nearly identical in three periods of time with the former at 4% in 2003 and then 3% and the latter starting at 5% and reaching 4% in the final year. Turning to the figure for individuals consuming fast food a few times a year with the starting point at 12%, which then it observed an increasing trend and reached 15% in 2006.
- Some groups of people have benefited from modern communication technology However some think they do not have any benefit from this To what extent do you agree or disagree 61
- The graph below gives information on the numbers of participants for different activities at one social centre in Melbourne Australia for the period 2000 to 2020 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons w 73
- You should spend about 20 minutes on this task The table below shows the number of temporary migrant worker in four countries in 2003 and 2006 and the number of these workers per 1 000 people in these countries in 2006 Summarise the information by selecti 67
- The diagram below shows the floor plan of a public library 20 years ago and how it looks now 78
- The given charts give information about the number of students at university in the UK from 1991 to 2001 government spending and the types of family economic background they came from in 1991 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, similarly, then
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 6.8 176% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 33.7804878049 127% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1073.0 965.302439024 111% => OK
No of words: 233.0 196.424390244 119% => OK
Chars per words: 4.60515021459 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.90696013833 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54494495591 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 131.0 106.607317073 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.562231759657 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 315.0 283.868780488 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 3.36585365854 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 29.0 22.4926829268 129% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 35.562445079 43.030603864 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 134.125 112.824112599 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.125 22.9334400587 127% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.5 5.23603664747 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.247099926568 0.215688989381 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.121465399232 0.103423049105 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.120949124387 0.0843802449381 143% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.187639199636 0.15604864568 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.143799560145 0.0819641961636 175% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.2329268293 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.96 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.2 10.3012195122 118% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.05 11.4140731707 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.12 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.9970731707 124% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.