The bar chart shows the divorce rate into European countries from 2011 to 2015

Essay topics:

The bar chart shows the divorce rate into European countries from 2011 to 2015

The bar chart illustrates the percentages of divorce in Finland and Sweden for a period of 5 years.

Overall, in the beginning of the era of the diverse trade in Finland was less as compared to Sweden. On the other hand there was a significant increase in the diverse rates of Finland and it out outraced Sweden at the competition of the period.

Sweden divorce rate was 37% in the year 2011. Then it rose to almost 50% in 2012. However, there was a gradual decrease in rates in 2013 and 2014 a mountain 47% and 43% respectively. After that the graph depicts the decline in the rates to 37% at the end of the period.

In the beginning of the period rates of divorce in Finland almost 37%. There was a steep decline in 2012 with rates of amounting to 32%. Afterwards, the rates were elevated to 39% in the year 2013 and 42% in 2014. The rates remain study for the next year, outracing the rate of Sweden.

Votes
Average: 6.7 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2024-07-04 dorae 78 view
2024-06-26 unstoppable 67 view
2024-06-10 bassmodulators123 73 view
2024-06-09 Helen L 67 view
2024-06-09 Helen L 67 view
Essays by user navjot jammu :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 79, Rule ID: COMP_THAN[1]
Message: Comparison requires 'than', not 'then' nor 'as'.
Suggestion: than
...f the diverse trade in Finland was less as compared to Sweden. On the other hand t...
^^
Line 5, column 184, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “After” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...14 a mountain 47% and 43% respectively. After that the graph depicts the decline in t...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 159, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... amounting to 32%. Afterwards, the rates were elevated to 39% in the year 2013 an...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, then, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 743.0 965.302439024 77% => OK
No of words: 170.0 196.424390244 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.37058823529 4.92477711251 89% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.61087313685 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.41527004945 2.65546596893 91% => OK
Unique words: 81.0 106.607317073 76% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.476470588235 0.547539520022 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 221.4 283.868780488 78% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 22.4926829268 67% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 28.3163942235 43.030603864 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 67.5454545455 112.824112599 60% => More chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 15.4545454545 22.9334400587 67% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.27272727273 5.23603664747 63% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.09268292683 220% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.172526357619 0.215688989381 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0788603272082 0.103423049105 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0638877042275 0.0843802449381 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.119996948845 0.15604864568 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0545070081662 0.0819641961636 67% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 6.9 13.2329268293 52% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 81.63 61.2550243902 133% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 5.6 10.3012195122 54% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 7.77 11.4140731707 68% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.98 8.06136585366 87% => OK
difficult_words: 28.0 40.7170731707 69% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.9970731707 73% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.