The bar chart shows the divorce rate into European countries from 2011 to 2015
The bar chart illustrates the percentages of divorce in Finland and Sweden for a period of 5 years.
Overall, in the beginning of the era of the diverse trade in Finland was less as compared to Sweden. On the other hand there was a significant increase in the diverse rates of Finland and it out outraced Sweden at the competition of the period.
Sweden divorce rate was 37% in the year 2011. Then it rose to almost 50% in 2012. However, there was a gradual decrease in rates in 2013 and 2014 a mountain 47% and 43% respectively. After that the graph depicts the decline in the rates to 37% at the end of the period.
In the beginning of the period rates of divorce in Finland almost 37%. There was a steep decline in 2012 with rates of amounting to 32%. Afterwards, the rates were elevated to 39% in the year 2013 and 42% in 2014. The rates remain study for the next year, outracing the rate of Sweden.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-04-17 | aceg1000 | 84 | view |
| 2025-01-01 | Tabassum Zaman | 67 | view |
| 2024-11-10 | nobitaa | 78 | view |
| 2024-11-10 | nobitaa | 78 | view |
| 2024-11-04 | khanhkhanhlhp | view |
- The bar chart shows the divorce rate into European countries from 2011 to 2015 56
- You have recently come back from Overseas holiday. You faced some problems m with the hotel booked through your travel agent.Write a letter to your travel agent in your letterDetails about hotel bookingProblems that you face thereGive suggestions to a tra 87
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of Australian men and women in different age groups who did regular physical activity in 2010. 84
- It is important for children to learn the difference between right and wrong at an early age. Punishment is necessary to have them learn this distinction. What extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion? What sort of punishment should parents and t 89
- The chart shows that distribution of employed and unemployed people in Philippines in 1932 and in 1992 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 79, Rule ID: COMP_THAN[1]
Message: Comparison requires 'than', not 'then' nor 'as'.
Suggestion: than
...f the diverse trade in Finland was less as compared to Sweden. On the other hand t...
^^
Line 5, column 184, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “After” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...14 a mountain 47% and 43% respectively. After that the graph depicts the decline in t...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 159, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... amounting to 32%. Afterwards, the rates were elevated to 39% in the year 2013 an...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, then, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 743.0 965.302439024 77% => OK
No of words: 170.0 196.424390244 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.37058823529 4.92477711251 89% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.61087313685 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.41527004945 2.65546596893 91% => OK
Unique words: 81.0 106.607317073 76% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.476470588235 0.547539520022 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 221.4 283.868780488 78% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 22.4926829268 67% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 28.3163942235 43.030603864 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 67.5454545455 112.824112599 60% => More chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 15.4545454545 22.9334400587 67% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.27272727273 5.23603664747 63% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.09268292683 220% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.172526357619 0.215688989381 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0788603272082 0.103423049105 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0638877042275 0.0843802449381 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.119996948845 0.15604864568 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0545070081662 0.0819641961636 67% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 6.9 13.2329268293 52% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 81.63 61.2550243902 133% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 5.6 10.3012195122 54% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 7.77 11.4140731707 68% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.98 8.06136585366 87% => OK
difficult_words: 28.0 40.7170731707 69% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.9970731707 73% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.