The bar chart illustrates in change of European young people expectation over 20 years in 5 different aspects.
Overall, 3 of 5 areas related to quality will have decrease trending while just one of all get a same percentage in improve and worse.
To begin with, the lowest aspect will improve in the next 20 years is Air quality with just 23% when the opposite is get worse up to 77% out of 100%. To be specific, Health and Water quality are expected than Air quality approximately 2 times. Followed by, Health and Water quality, which are higher than the Air one, still will improve under 50% with 42% and 40% respectation.
The only areas that young people supposed that will improve and get worse are equal with both 50% is Food quality in which is interested. In addition, areas which is gain most prediction is people communication. The statistic of these one more than Air quality 3 times, Health and Water quality 1,5 times with 67% improvement and only 33% get worse
- People living in the twenty first century have a better quality of life than people who live in previous centuries To what extent do you agree or disagree 56
- Children should do organized activities in their free time while others believe children should be free to do what they want Discuss both views and give your opinion 67
- Children should do organized activities in their free time while others believe children should be free to do what they want Discuss both views and give your opinion 67
- The table below gives information about students studying in six departments in an Australian university in 2011
- Some people think that employers should not care about the way their employees dress because what matters is the quality of their work To what extent do you agree or disagree 56
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 73, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nge of European young people expectation over 20 years in 5 different aspects. O...
^^
Line 3, column 318, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...lity, which are higher than the Air one, still will improve under 50% with 42% an...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, still, while, in addition, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 1.00243902439 399% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 33.7804878049 74% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 806.0 965.302439024 83% => OK
No of words: 173.0 196.424390244 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.65895953757 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.62669911048 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.52453628167 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 97.0 106.607317073 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.560693641618 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 244.8 283.868780488 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 24.4716034415 43.030603864 57% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 100.75 112.824112599 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.625 22.9334400587 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.5 5.23603664747 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.224204529128 0.215688989381 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.127728216529 0.103423049105 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.193840438578 0.0843802449381 230% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.20680995442 0.15604864568 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.244042365658 0.0819641961636 298% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 13.2329268293 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.75 11.4140731707 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.6 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 32.0 40.7170731707 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 73, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nge of European young people expectation over 20 years in 5 different aspects. O...
^^
Line 3, column 318, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...lity, which are higher than the Air one, still will improve under 50% with 42% an...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, still, while, in addition, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 1.00243902439 399% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 33.7804878049 74% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 806.0 965.302439024 83% => OK
No of words: 173.0 196.424390244 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.65895953757 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.62669911048 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.52453628167 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 97.0 106.607317073 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.560693641618 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 244.8 283.868780488 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 24.4716034415 43.030603864 57% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 100.75 112.824112599 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.625 22.9334400587 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.5 5.23603664747 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.224204529128 0.215688989381 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.127728216529 0.103423049105 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.193840438578 0.0843802449381 230% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.20680995442 0.15604864568 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.244042365658 0.0819641961636 298% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 13.2329268293 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.75 11.4140731707 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.6 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 32.0 40.7170731707 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.