The bar chart depicts the expectation to adjust of European juveniles over the next 20 years in five specific categories.
Overall, European youngsters show their preference for improving people interaction as well as the quality of nourishment. Conversely, most of them ignore the magnitude of healthcare systems, air quality and water quality.
Health-related issues will be projected to deteriorate in the next 20 years with more than 50% of young people agreeing with it. The percentage of youngsters who want air quality to be enhanced just below 30%, which will be the lowest category in the five. The air quality will have the same trend as those above, with precisely 40% of juveniles having the intention to improve, which was lower than those who want it to get worse.
However, the categories of people communication and food quality have the opposite trend. The ratio of those who want the quality of commodities worse will be approximately 50%, which will be half of those who do not. The proportion of youngsters who show their inclination towards people interaction will dramatically increase to about 62%. The figure for those who do not have desire is just under 30%.
- Space travel has been possible for some time and some people say that space tourism will be developed in the future What do you think space travel is positive or negative a development 84
- Some people think that employers should not care about the way their employees dress because what matters is the quality of their work To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
- The bar chart shows expectation to change of European young people in the next 20 years in 5 different areas 78
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 343, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...ill dramatically increase to about 62%. The figure for those who do not have desire...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
conversely, however, if, well, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 1.00243902439 599% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 3.15609756098 285% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 10.0 5.60731707317 178% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 3.97073170732 227% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1004.0 965.302439024 104% => OK
No of words: 196.0 196.424390244 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.12244897959 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.74165738677 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83366814136 2.65546596893 107% => OK
Unique words: 108.0 106.607317073 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.551020408163 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 307.8 283.868780488 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 27.891934318 43.030603864 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.4 112.824112599 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.6 22.9334400587 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.1 5.23603664747 78% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 1.13902439024 439% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.171970405968 0.215688989381 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0796372808105 0.103423049105 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.109799039627 0.0843802449381 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.143277574644 0.15604864568 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.122266004186 0.0819641961636 149% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.2329268293 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 61.2550243902 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 11.4140731707 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.2 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 343, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...ill dramatically increase to about 62%. The figure for those who do not have desire...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
conversely, however, if, well, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 1.00243902439 599% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 3.15609756098 285% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 10.0 5.60731707317 178% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 3.97073170732 227% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1004.0 965.302439024 104% => OK
No of words: 196.0 196.424390244 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.12244897959 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.74165738677 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83366814136 2.65546596893 107% => OK
Unique words: 108.0 106.607317073 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.551020408163 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 307.8 283.868780488 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 27.891934318 43.030603864 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.4 112.824112599 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.6 22.9334400587 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.1 5.23603664747 78% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 1.13902439024 439% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.171970405968 0.215688989381 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0796372808105 0.103423049105 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.109799039627 0.0843802449381 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.143277574644 0.15604864568 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.122266004186 0.0819641961636 149% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.2329268293 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 61.2550243902 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 11.4140731707 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.2 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.