Some people think that employers should not care about the way their employees dress because what matters is the quality of their work To what extent do you agree or disagree

It is an issue of controversy over the importance of dress regulations in companies. While I believe that dress manner is a contributing factor to the zenith of success of enterprises, I subscribe to the opinion that the magnitude of dress code is of little account in the work quality.

Exponents with the standpoint that the way employees dress plays an instrumental role in the achievements of firms tend to point out several reasons. To commence with, the garments that they put on exert desirable impacts on their vibes and attitudes. The reason has something to do with the fact that no sooner do staff wear their all-time favourite or proper items can they have a good-looking appearance and boost their confidence. As a result, this will pave the way for a myriad of job opportunities and business contracts since people in this day and age show their preference for those who attach importance to appearance. Moreover, employees can also be drawn to the attention of other colleagues when they have a good image in others 'eyes. This can be exemplified by the fact that in some fashion enterprises, human resources have a tendency to lean toward someone who has aesthetic appreciation.

The benefits of other factors apart from dress regulation that influence the quality of work also should be taken into consideration. First and foremost, the need for skills such as logical thinking and calculation is vital. An explanation is that only by having those who have a head for figures can businesses distribute private funds properly. Hence, this creates a favourable condition for companies to reduce unnecessary outlays and pour money into appropriate aspects, followed by making ends meet. Furthermore, interpersonal skills perform an integral part in the succession of business. For example, two CEOs of a sponge company in America succeeded in bringing their business with a total subsidy of over 800.000$ - by pursuing investors from a TV program known as Shark Tank.

In conclusion, although dress code is of paramount necessity for firms in order to come to fruition, the upsides of numerous categories should not be underestimated.

Votes
Average: 8.9 (2 votes)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 719, Rule ID: CURRENCY[1]
Message: The currency mark is usually put at the beginning of the number: '$000'.
Suggestion: $000
...siness with a total subsidy of over 800.000$ - by pursuing investors from a TV progr...
^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, hence, if, look, moreover, so, while, apart from, for example, in conclusion, such as, as a result

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 57.0 41.998997996 136% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.3376753507 192% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1804.0 1615.20841683 112% => OK
No of words: 352.0 315.596192385 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.125 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.33147354134 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99902479154 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 210.0 176.041082164 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.596590909091 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 561.6 506.74238477 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.9392689539 49.4020404114 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.266666667 106.682146367 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.4666666667 20.7667163134 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.6 7.06120827912 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 8.67935871743 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.160448880606 0.244688304435 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0483008316207 0.084324248473 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0367201334725 0.0667982634062 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0852450838799 0.151304729494 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0366074070753 0.056905535591 64% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.77 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.35 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 78.4519038076 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 719, Rule ID: CURRENCY[1]
Message: The currency mark is usually put at the beginning of the number: '$000'.
Suggestion: $000
...siness with a total subsidy of over 800.000$ - by pursuing investors from a TV progr...
^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, hence, if, look, moreover, so, while, apart from, for example, in conclusion, such as, as a result

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 57.0 41.998997996 136% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.3376753507 192% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1804.0 1615.20841683 112% => OK
No of words: 352.0 315.596192385 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.125 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.33147354134 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99902479154 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 210.0 176.041082164 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.596590909091 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 561.6 506.74238477 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.9392689539 49.4020404114 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.266666667 106.682146367 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.4666666667 20.7667163134 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.6 7.06120827912 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 8.67935871743 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.160448880606 0.244688304435 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0483008316207 0.084324248473 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0367201334725 0.0667982634062 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0852450838799 0.151304729494 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0366074070753 0.056905535591 64% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.77 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.35 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 78.4519038076 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.