It is evident that the prevalence of interstellar travel is undeniable and gaining more prosperity in the modern epoch. While I believe that the development of spaceflight is considered to be detrimental, I subscribe to the opinion that this phenomenon has numerous benefits in many ways.
On the one hand, exponents of the standpoint that this prosperity is deemed to be an adverse progress tend to point out several reasons. To commence with, journeys through the cosmos can put people’s constitution in jeopardy. The reason is that no sooner do travelers get exposed to the universe than they are likely to be negatively influenced by cosmic radiation. As a consequence, this can be a contributor to unforeseen serious health risks. Moreover, paying a visit to outer space can pose a threat to the living world and natural resources. It is due to the fact that only by consuming an enormous amount of energy and resources can interstellar travel operate with spaceships. Hence, this can exert detrimental impacts on the environment and economy of nations.
On the other hand, the upsides of space tourism should also be taken into consideration. First and foremost, thanks to the thriving intergalactic travel, people can derive from numerous job opportunities. An explanation is that this sector creates a favorable condition for people to engage in some processes such as manufacturing space vehicles and managing spacecraft. As a result, this can significantly alleviate the unemployment rate in the future. Furthermore, space tourism can pave the way for novel breakthroughs. Since citizens are given an equal chance to discover the universe, they may detect new materials that have never been revealed before. Therefore, people can seize a chance to develop creative innovation in science technology.
In conclusion, although the emergence of outer space tourism may have some drawbacks, its perks should not be underestimated.
- Space travel has been possible for some time and some people say that space tourism will be developed in the future What do you think space travel is positive or negative a development 84
- The bar chart shows expectation to change of European young people in the next 20 years in 5 different areas 78
- Some people think that employers should not care about the way their employees dress because what matters is the quality of their work To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, hence, if, may, moreover, so, therefore, while, in conclusion, such as, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1650.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 307.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.37459283388 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18585898806 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.15032047466 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 188.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.612377850163 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 524.7 506.74238477 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 29.6275612824 49.4020404114 60% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 97.0588235294 106.682146367 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0588235294 20.7667163134 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.82352941176 7.06120827912 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.264953313385 0.244688304435 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0750602605085 0.084324248473 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0577139304954 0.0667982634062 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.156586535169 0.151304729494 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0584330932016 0.056905535591 103% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.57 12.4159519038 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.83 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 103.0 78.4519038076 131% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.