The bar chart shows the expectation to change of European young people in the next 20 years in 5 different areas.
The manifested bar char evinces a foresight for the variations which will occur in the European countries among juvenile citizens in the forthcoming one-fifth of a century in five miscellaneous sections.
Turning to the chart, as can be seen, in the areas of Health, Air Quality, and Water Quality, the status quo will face tribulations. For instance, in the health and water quality section, they will just ameliorate over 40% and exactly 40%, respectively. Nonetheless, the Air quality district will go through an exorbitant annihilation, and its value will approach approximately 22%.
Regarding the two rest fields, i.e., the food quality and people communication, they are almost satiating or completely improving. The food quality section, which is to what extent satisfying, will reach 50% or thereabouts. And people communication will be the most satisfactory field among all five areas. So that it is to be ca 64%, which is more than triple air quality.
Generally speaking, according to the char, one can find that the trend indicates that young European people cannot experience a plausible life thanks to the general deterioration.
- The plans below show a student room for two people and a student room for one person at an Australian university 73
- The graph shows the monthly expenditure on three types of restaurant food in Australia The plot shows the annual number of restaurant visits for the same types of food between 1965 and 2015 100
- The graph below shows the number of hours per day on average that children spent watching television 85
- Some people believe that all children should have a pet or an animal to look after Other people disagree however saying that this depends on a child s circumstances Consider these opposing views and give your own opinion 100
- Some observers say that police officer should be recruited from the communities where they work so that they have local knowledge Other people say that this is unnecessary or even undesirable Where do you stand on this debate Is local knowledge essential 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 204, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...is to what extent satisfying, will reach 50% or thereabouts. And people communica...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, nonetheless, regarding, so, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 1.00243902439 998% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 17.0 33.7804878049 50% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 974.0 965.302439024 101% => OK
No of words: 181.0 196.424390244 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.38121546961 4.92477711251 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.66791821706 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.09899938656 2.65546596893 117% => OK
Unique words: 118.0 106.607317073 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.651933701657 0.547539520022 119% => OK
syllable_count: 290.7 283.868780488 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.4392311288 43.030603864 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.222222222 112.824112599 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1111111111 22.9334400587 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.88888888889 5.23603664747 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0891568496093 0.215688989381 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0342097538864 0.103423049105 33% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0343350814446 0.0843802449381 41% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.057268197197 0.15604864568 37% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0253712046438 0.0819641961636 31% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.2329268293 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 61.2550243902 84% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.92 11.4140731707 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.08 8.06136585366 113% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 40.7170731707 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.