The table below shows the expenditures of four car companies on advertising in the UK in 2002

Essay topics:

The table below shows the expenditures of four car companies on advertising in the UK in 2002.

The manifested table underneath evinces disbursements of advertisements, e.g., in TV, Cinema, and press, of four vehicles companies, such as Renault, and Rover, in the united kingdom in 2002.

Regarding the advertisements of TV, radio, and Cinema, as can be seen, Cetirizine defrayed the highest cost ($70 m) on TV, while Rover paid the lowest one ($45 m). About Cinema, even though Renault and Vauxhall disbursed almost the same money, the two rest companies paid nothing. And turning to radio, the payment of all companies was identical.

Concerning the advertisement in Outdoor, one can find that notwithstanding the expense of Renault and Vauxhall was the same, that of the two other companies, i.e., Rover and Cetirizine, was the lowest cost (ca $2.5 m). And about Press, the expenditure of Renault and Rover is approximately 6 and 5 times of Vauxhall.

Overall, it can be found that Although the aforementioned companies had a strong penchant for investment in TV, accompanied by Press. They almost did not attend to Cinema and outdoor advertisement.

Votes
Average: 8.4 (2 votes)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2022-04-19 sammixmht10 view
2022-02-20 thanhtam2709 82 view
2021-10-11 haohao 76 view
2021-08-31 Louisa_Nguyễn 67 view
2021-07-13 Tienanh99 73 view
Essays by user ata :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 108, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... had a strong penchant for investment in TV, accompanied by Press. They almost di...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
e.g., if, regarding, while, such as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 1.00243902439 299% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 22.0 33.7804878049 65% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 885.0 965.302439024 92% => OK
No of words: 171.0 196.424390244 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.17543859649 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.61617157096 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.17934021989 2.65546596893 120% => OK
Unique words: 103.0 106.607317073 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.602339181287 0.547539520022 110% => OK
syllable_count: 260.1 283.868780488 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 5.0 0.482926829268 1035% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.7371662831 43.030603864 120% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.625 112.824112599 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.375 22.9334400587 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.375 5.23603664747 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.120661293275 0.215688989381 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0512919650207 0.103423049105 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0342352036361 0.0843802449381 41% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0736604294419 0.15604864568 47% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0341685917185 0.0819641961636 42% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.2329268293 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.76 11.4140731707 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.02 8.06136585366 112% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 40.7170731707 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.