The table below shows the numbers of visitors to Ashdown Museum during the year before and the year after it was refurbished The charts show the result of surveys asking visitors who satisfied they were with their visit during the same two periods

Essay topics:

The table below shows the numbers of visitors to Ashdown Museum during the year before and the year after it was refurbished. The charts show the result of surveys asking visitors who satisfied they were with their visit, during the same two periods.

The manifested table underneath evinces the figure of vising persons of Ashdown Museum in the course of two years, one year before the renovation, one year after that. The chart also demonstrates the upshots of surveys investigating the satiation of people during those years.

According to the table, as can be found, in the preceding year of refurbishment, the number of visitors was 74,000 while one year after, this figure improved to 92,000.

Turning to the chart on the sinistral flank, one can see before reconstruction, approximately fifty percent of visitors were dissatisfied or very dissatisfied. Nonetheless, just 45% of the people were satisfied or very satisfies. However, regarding the snapshot on the dextral flank, it can be found after renovating, although the number of satisfied and very satisfied visitors considerably enhanced and reached 75%. The fraction of people with the antithesis point declined to 20%.

Overall, it is worth noting the number of people remaining undecided was the same (5%). After refurbishment, apart from the increase in the number of visitors, the fraction of (very) satisfied people exorbitantly grew while people with opposite opinion went down.

Votes
Average: 8.4 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2023-07-25 wfc 89 view
2023-04-13 ililmaidatuz view
2023-04-13 ililmaidatuz 80 view
2023-04-13 ililmaidatuz view
2023-04-13 ililmaidatuz view
Essays by user ata :

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, nonetheless, regarding, so, while, apart from

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 1.00243902439 299% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1017.0 965.302439024 105% => OK
No of words: 187.0 196.424390244 95% => OK
Chars per words: 5.4385026738 4.92477711251 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.69794460899 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00380572091 2.65546596893 113% => OK
Unique words: 106.0 106.607317073 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.566844919786 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 308.7 283.868780488 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.1802694227 43.030603864 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.0 112.824112599 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.7777777778 22.9334400587 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.11111111111 5.23603664747 136% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.289281652456 0.215688989381 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.106900726183 0.103423049105 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0485229625485 0.0843802449381 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.163672897355 0.15604864568 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0450271372292 0.0819641961636 55% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.2329268293 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 61.2550243902 70% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.3012195122 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.27 11.4140731707 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.02 8.06136585366 112% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 40.7170731707 128% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.0658536585 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.