The bar chart shows expectations for change of European young people in the next 20 years in five different areas.
The given bar chart compares the European young people's anticipations for change in five areas, namely health, air quality, water quality, food quality, and people communications, in 20 years' time.
Overall, it is evident that only the people communication category shows an expectation for improvement from the majority of the young. In addition, air quality has the lowest improving prospect.
Regarding the categories of better chance for improvement, more than half of European young people, roughly 62% to be exact, believe people communication is likely to become better in the next 20 years. A similar expectation can be seen in food quality since its prospect is second only to that of people communication, with almost 50% expecting enhancement.
In terms of the three remaining categories, there is approximately 60% disbelief in better changes in water quality and health. Meanwhile, it is unlikely among the European young people that air quality will register any positive alterations in the following 20 years, which is reported that just over 20% expect positive differences.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-11-09 | nguyenanh9182 | 89 | view |
| 2023-10-11 | lalo | 84 | view |
- The best way for governments to solve the problem of traffic congestion is providing free public transport 24 hours per day and seven days a week To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
- More and more countries are making university education completely free for their citizens What are the advantages and disadvantages of this development Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience 67
- The first graph shows the number of train passengers from 2000 to 2009 the second compares the percentage of trains running on time and target in the period 84
- Around the world many adults are working from home and more children are beginning to study from home because technology has become cheaper and more accessible Do you think this is a positive or negative development 89
- The world of work is rapidly changing and employees cannot depend on having the same job or the same working conditions for life Why is it the case Can you suggest some ways to prepare people to work in the future 89
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, regarding, second, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 23.0 33.7804878049 68% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 3.97073170732 227% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 928.0 965.302439024 96% => OK
No of words: 170.0 196.424390244 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.45882352941 4.92477711251 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.61087313685 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.02810365818 2.65546596893 114% => OK
Unique words: 108.0 106.607317073 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.635294117647 0.547539520022 116% => OK
syllable_count: 288.9 283.868780488 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.2395228678 43.030603864 114% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.571428571 112.824112599 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.2857142857 22.9334400587 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.85714285714 5.23603664747 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.389389580234 0.215688989381 181% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.148290450053 0.103423049105 143% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.106412431632 0.0843802449381 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.21689677509 0.15604864568 139% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0727496146377 0.0819641961636 89% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.4 13.2329268293 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 61.2550243902 63% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.3012195122 134% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.68 11.4140731707 129% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.82 8.06136585366 109% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.