The bar chart shows the number of visitors to three London Museums between 2007 and 2012. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.Write at least 150 words

The chart shows number of visitors from 2007 to 2012 in three museums of London. From the chart it can be depicted that in year 2007, national gallery had the least visitors hardly 6 millions but visitors gradually increased to 16 millions in 2012.

However,there is no or hardly any change observed in number of visitors visiting Victoria and Albert museum in 2007-2008, national gallery in 2008-2009 as well as during 2010-2011 and British museum in 2008-2009.Further, It can be observed that Visitors to British museum first showed a decline from 12 millions to 6 millions and then visitors increased to 14 millions annually in year 2012.

Thus in a nutshell, it can be concluded that people have started showing interest in national gallery more with the passing of years and is the highest visited museum in 2012 with 16 million visitors. However, there are many ups and downs in all other museums, still the number of visitors have not even crossed 14 million visitors annually.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 8, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , there
...ased to 16 millions in 2012. However,there is no or hardly any change observed in ...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 18, Rule ID: NOW[2]
Message: Did you mean 'now' (=at this moment) instead of 'no' (negation)?
Suggestion: now
... millions in 2012. However,there is no or hardly any change observed in number...
^^
Line 3, column 213, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Further
...10-2011 and British museum in 2008-2009.Further, It can be observed that Visitors to Br...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...o 14 millions annually in year 2012. Thus in a nutshell, it can be concluded that...
^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, still, then, thus, well, as well as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 1.00243902439 299% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 825.0 965.302439024 85% => OK
No of words: 166.0 196.424390244 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.96987951807 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.58944267634 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71539778056 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 91.0 106.607317073 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.548192771084 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 230.4 283.868780488 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 5.0 8.94146341463 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 33.0 22.4926829268 147% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 105.331097023 43.030603864 245% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 165.0 112.824112599 146% => OK
Words per sentence: 33.2 22.9334400587 145% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.2 5.23603664747 214% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.20991477907 0.215688989381 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.164113256335 0.103423049105 159% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.129579209017 0.0843802449381 154% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.170185428986 0.15604864568 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0855268039849 0.0819641961636 104% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.6 13.2329268293 141% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.9 61.2550243902 90% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.3012195122 134% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.14 11.4140731707 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.51 8.06136585366 106% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 40.7170731707 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 17.0 11.4329268293 149% => OK
gunning_fog: 15.2 10.9970731707 138% => OK
text_standard: 19.0 11.0658536585 172% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.