The bar chart shows reasons for teenagers leaving school in 3 regions in Brivania in 2010 The table shows the types of jobs that school leavers in the 3 regions had in the same year Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features an

Essay topics:

The bar chart shows reasons for teenagers' leaving school in 3 regions in Brivania in 2010. The table shows the types of jobs that school leavers in the 3 regions had in the same year.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The bar chart illustrates the percentage of teenagers left school by five reasons and the table expresses the proportion of types of jobs done by education leavers in gandania, donkeytown and dayanta in 2010.
Overall, the graduated made younger leave school which was the highest compared to other figures, while the opposite was true for the number of others reason. In addition, the majority of professional was been by school leavers in three regions.
Concerning to the bar chart, with nearly 95% was the total of graduated in donkeytown, making it was 15% and under 40% higher than that of gandania and dayanta. Besides, the percentage of student left school by could not afford school in donkeytown approximate 2% which was lower than the figures of gandania and dayanta, with the former being over 15% and the letter being nearly 30%. Especially, the health problems and expelled reason in gandania and donkeytown was equal, which was under 2%. Moreover, the propotion of teenager left school by health problems, expelled and others in dayanta was always higher than other regions.
Turning to the table chart, with 64% was the percentage of professional in donkeytown in 2010 which was the highest figure to other nations. Similarly, the proportion of proffessional in dayanta was double the figure of gandamia. On the other hand, the schoool leavers was unemployed in donkeytown, which was nearly a third of number in gandamia, with 12%. And the percentage of mamual in gandamia, donkeytown and dayanta was around 46%, 24% and 35%.

Votes
Average: 6.7 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2023-09-12 nhu20-06 67 view

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 202, Rule ID: WAS_BEEN[1]
Message: Did you mean 'was' or 'has been'?
Suggestion: was; has been
... addition, the majority of professional was been by school leavers in three regions. C...
^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, moreover, similarly, so, third, while, in addition, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 7.0 257% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 6.8 176% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 33.7804878049 145% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1291.0 965.302439024 134% => OK
No of words: 254.0 196.424390244 129% => OK
Chars per words: 5.08267716535 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.99216450694 3.73543355544 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67395882543 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 117.0 106.607317073 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.46062992126 0.547539520022 84% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 369.0 283.868780488 130% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.099999063 43.030603864 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.363636364 112.824112599 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0909090909 22.9334400587 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.09090909091 5.23603664747 135% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.131271242988 0.215688989381 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0673745365465 0.103423049105 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.070364189693 0.0843802449381 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.125181226284 0.15604864568 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.086452542494 0.0819641961636 105% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.2329268293 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 61.2550243902 92% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.48 11.4140731707 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.2 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 55.0 40.7170731707 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.