The chart provides information about the points that three different teams have received among four different seasons.
Overall, team B lead the highest score between the other teams, meanwhile, two other teams (team A and Team c) points were fluctuating from 2002 to 2005.
First of all, Team B was the most successful team since 2002. It reached the highest score by 82 points in 2002, in addition, the amount felt markedly from 82 to 60 in 2003. However, Team A started with the lowest score in 2002 and gradually increased to 35 points in 2004. In the last season, Team A's score reduced to 8 points, conversely, Team B's score was rocketing to 55 points.
According to the statistics, Team C scores were developing over 2 seasons and reached the maximum points in 2003. After that, the points moderately decreased to 12 and 15 points in the last two seasons.
- The bar chart shows the scores of teams A,B and C over four different seasons. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 67
- The diagrams below contain information regarding percentages of people occupied in various types of position in 1998 and 2001 Write a report for a university tutor describing the information shown
- Modern technology has made it easier for individuals to download copyrighted music and books from the internet for no charge.To what extent is this a positive or a negative development ? 56
- The bar chart shows the scores of teams A B and C over four different seasons Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 76
- The graph below shows the proportion of the population aged 65 and over between 1940 and 2040 in three different countries.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
conversely, first, however, if, so, while, in addition, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 33.7804878049 77% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 718.0 965.302439024 74% => OK
No of words: 151.0 196.424390244 77% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.75496688742 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.50545371207 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.52024825034 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 88.0 106.607317073 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.582781456954 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 187.2 283.868780488 66% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.2 1.45097560976 83% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 24.0958372961 43.030603864 56% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 89.75 112.824112599 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.875 22.9334400587 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.5 5.23603664747 162% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.208614187015 0.215688989381 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.102816865873 0.103423049105 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0680867335433 0.0843802449381 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.149183531431 0.15604864568 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0651072535608 0.0819641961636 79% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.4 13.2329268293 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 87.05 61.2550243902 142% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 5.6 10.3012195122 54% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 10.27 11.4140731707 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.67 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 30.0 40.7170731707 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.