The bar chart describes about the total amount of phone calls that used by British civilization over 7 year. This informations represent 3 different type of phones.
It is obvious that Loacl-Fixed line was the famous type in UK throughout several years. However, mobiles calls wa the least popular compared the others.
In 1995, UK people used local fixed line for more than 70 billions minutes and it started the highest usage between mobile phone an other fixed line. After a couple years, 3 different types rose gradually until 1999. In addition, local fixed line reached the maximum spent for 90 billion minutes in 1999.
From 2000 to 2002 the 2 other less popular types (national and international fixed line and mobiles) trend were increasing when the local fixed line usage was gradually declining. At the end, mobiles calls was the most interesting type because it reached the biggest movement after 1999.
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 110, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: These
...ed by British civilization over 7 year. This informations represent 3 different type...
^^^^
Line 5, column 130, Rule ID: AN_OTHER[1]
Message: Did you mean 'another'? This word sequence is usually spelled together.
Suggestion: another
... the highest usage between mobile phone an other fixed line. After a couple years, 3 dif...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 17.0 33.7804878049 50% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 769.0 965.302439024 80% => OK
No of words: 152.0 196.424390244 77% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.05921052632 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.51124308557 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.4561158755 2.65546596893 92% => OK
Unique words: 98.0 106.607317073 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.644736842105 0.547539520022 118% => OK
syllable_count: 233.1 283.868780488 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.4926829268 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 38.3811296227 43.030603864 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 85.4444444444 112.824112599 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.8888888889 22.9334400587 74% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.66666666667 5.23603664747 51% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.115069340512 0.215688989381 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0467909125003 0.103423049105 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0324913251555 0.0843802449381 39% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0691644836434 0.15604864568 44% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0179933235161 0.0819641961636 22% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 13.2329268293 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 61.2550243902 104% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 10.3012195122 82% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.77 11.4140731707 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.38 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 11.4329268293 57% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.9970731707 76% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 110, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: These
...ed by British civilization over 7 year. This informations represent 3 different type...
^^^^
Line 5, column 130, Rule ID: AN_OTHER[1]
Message: Did you mean 'another'? This word sequence is usually spelled together.
Suggestion: another
... the highest usage between mobile phone an other fixed line. After a couple years, 3 dif...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 17.0 33.7804878049 50% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 769.0 965.302439024 80% => OK
No of words: 152.0 196.424390244 77% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.05921052632 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.51124308557 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.4561158755 2.65546596893 92% => OK
Unique words: 98.0 106.607317073 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.644736842105 0.547539520022 118% => OK
syllable_count: 233.1 283.868780488 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.4926829268 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 38.3811296227 43.030603864 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 85.4444444444 112.824112599 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.8888888889 22.9334400587 74% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.66666666667 5.23603664747 51% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.115069340512 0.215688989381 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0467909125003 0.103423049105 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0324913251555 0.0843802449381 39% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0691644836434 0.15604864568 44% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0179933235161 0.0819641961636 22% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 13.2329268293 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 61.2550243902 104% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 10.3012195122 82% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.77 11.4140731707 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.38 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 11.4329268293 57% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.9970731707 76% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.