The bar chart illustrates the seasonal scores of team A, B and C over the four distinctive seasons. Overall comparing the scores of all three 3 teams in in the seasonal period of 4 years, it can be seen that team B has scored higher than any other team in the season of 2002 which is 82 points and had low points in the year of 2004 scoring only 43 points, which is lower score in terms of all the seasons for team A.
In Addition, while playing seasonal match in 2002 and 2003 team A has unable to score any thing scoring 5 and 11 points only, but had a better score in 2004 about 35 points well far behind than team B, whereas in 2005 team A has again has dropped the scoring points to 8 which the second low score of team B in all the seasons.
In Contrast, team C was little better in scoring than team A and has scored 15 points in seasonal matches of 2003 as compared to seasonal matches of 2005 only scoring 5 points. From these seasonal teams team B was the strongest in scoring whereas other kept their score below average.
- The first chart below gives information about the money spent by British parents on their children’s sports between 2008 and 2014. The second chart shows the number of children who participated in three sports in Britain over the same time period.Summar 67
- The graphs below show unemployment rates and average earnings according to level of education Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 74
- Modern technology has made it easier for individuals to download copyrighted music and books from the internet for no charge.To what extent is this a positive or a negative development ? 56
- The graph below shows average carbon dioxide CO2 emissions per person in the United Kingdom Sweden Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The chart below gives information about the number of social networking sites people used in Canada in 2014 and 2015.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 151, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: in
...mparing the scores of all three 3 teams in in the seasonal period of 4 years, it can ...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 87, Rule ID: ANY_BODY[2]
Message: Did you mean 'anything'?
Suggestion: anything
...002 and 2003 team A has unable to score any thing scoring 5 and 11 points only, but had a...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, second, so, well, whereas, while, in addition, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 838.0 965.302439024 87% => OK
No of words: 201.0 196.424390244 102% => OK
Chars per words: 4.16915422886 4.92477711251 85% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76529505866 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.15406224581 2.65546596893 81% => OK
Unique words: 98.0 106.607317073 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.487562189055 0.547539520022 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 227.7 283.868780488 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.1 1.45097560976 76% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 5.0 8.94146341463 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 40.0 22.4926829268 178% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 99.1047930223 43.030603864 230% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 167.6 112.824112599 149% => OK
Words per sentence: 40.2 22.9334400587 175% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.6 5.23603664747 241% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.208960564215 0.215688989381 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.173827366265 0.103423049105 168% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0899507939067 0.0843802449381 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.170426000995 0.15604864568 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0307254783556 0.0819641961636 37% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.3 13.2329268293 138% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 73.18 61.2550243902 119% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.3012195122 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 7.79 11.4140731707 68% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.43 8.06136585366 92% => OK
difficult_words: 23.0 40.7170731707 56% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 17.0 11.4329268293 149% => OK
gunning_fog: 18.0 10.9970731707 164% => OK
text_standard: 18.0 11.0658536585 163% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.